User talk:Dianavsmith

Welcome!
Hello, Dianavsmith, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 22:34, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Speedy deletion of "Sue Best"
A page you created, Sue Best, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it has no content\, other than external links\, categories\, "see also" sections\, rephrasing of the title\, and/or chat-like comments.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a &#123;&#123;Talkback&#125;&#125; message on my talk page. @ 02:44, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello I dream of horses, I have updated the content and added an additional secondary source to the Susan Best entry. It now has 3 in total (as well as primary sources). I think it should now fit with the notability criteria. Thanks. Dianavsmith (talk) 04:05, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Susan Best


The article Susan Best has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. red dog six (talk) 03:05, 22 October 2014 (UTC)


 * I am new to wikipedia and wasn't familiar with the Notability Policy. I updated the entry with two references, however these are not secondary sources so I'm still not sure if this entry adheres to the policy. Dianavsmith (talk) 04:48, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I've added two secondary sources - it's now close to the notability borderline, but that can be tested in a deletion debate. --99of9 (talk) 06:07, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Much appreciated! This is a great help. I'll also look for some additional secondary sources. I'm not too sure what takes place in a deletion debate but I assume I will find out soon. Thanks again for your help. Dianavsmith (talk) 01:48, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Hello again - I've just added another secondary source, so hopefully that will be enough to prevent deletion. Thanks Dianavsmith (talk) 04:07, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Nice work!
Posted automatically via sandbox guided tour. Dianavsmith (talk) 08:16, 25 October 2014 (UTC)