User talk:Diaphanousolid

Your question
Hi! Fair question and thanks for asking. Thanks for being nice about it as well. The problem is the lack of major third-party coverage beyond the official website, a blog and a site of questionable notability. Since this site isn't censored, it wasn't deleted because of the subject matter. What I can do is this: I'll restore it under the proper titling convention without the quotes and put a standard notability concern tag at the top. There are a few ways it can then go: It'll be speedy deleted by another admin, it'll be tagged as a proposed deletion after five days, it may be proposed for deletion by community consensus...or nothing at all might happen and it'll be expanded by other editors. It was a borderline call on my part, I admit. I wish you luck and I hope you'll contribute more. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:44, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

Nomination of BDSM: It's Not What You Think! for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BDSM: It's Not What You Think! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BDSM: It's Not What You Think! until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:03, 12 September 2013 (UTC)