User talk:Diarmada

Andrew Glasgow
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please read WP:AUTO and WP:VANITY with regard to creating autobiographical articles.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  06:40, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Wmarch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wmarch.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 23:46, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Wmarch.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wmarch.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Brown Cow &#149; (how now?) 23:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Texas in the South
Hi, I was just wondering what your opinion on Texas being part of the South is. There has been some debate about this; 86% of Texans consider themselves Southerners, and Texas was part of the Confederacy, but many non-Texans group Texas with the Southwest. If we can get the opinions of people from the Deep South about Texas, it would help. Thanks! --Stallions2010 19:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Joseph Heller
Your image was not released under the GFDL licence, as required for Wikipedia. If you or the image creator reserve any additional rights (eg "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" or "educational use only"), they cannot be accepted, and are deleted as soon as an admin gets to them to protect the copyright holder's reserved rights. Ironically, the uploader of an untagged image would be given some time to licence it, since there isn't the same immediate copyright issue.

Articles and images must be released under GFDL, or public domain, or be fully justified fair use. Hope this helps, jimfbleak 08:36, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The fair use tag in the Samuel Beckett article may be suspect if the copyright holder is alive and has not been contacted. jimfbleak 08:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I've deleted the "fair use" Samuel Beckett photo, since it's clearly not fair use if the photographer hasn't been contacted. It's a real problem with copyright images, since although many photographers will give limited release, few are prepared to sign up to GFDL, which permits commercial use. Jimfbleak.talk. 17:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Powerlinesky.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Powerlinesky.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 11:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

William March
Happy to do it. You've done a great job with the article, and I've nominated it for good article status.  auburn pilot   talk  22:07, 25 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Just a note to let you know William March's nomination for good article status was successful. Congrats on all your hard work.  auburn pilot   talk  07:57, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Elegy to the Spanish Republic -172.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Elegy to the Spanish Republic -172.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 21:07, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Taxes
God wants Pat Robertson to pay taxes. Next Week! Does God want you to pay rent?Govtrust I own Grieder's Secrets of the Temple which is a well written overview of the Federal Reserve. The book has a strong populist slant but you're welcome to borrow it if you'd like. It's an interesting question about whether the legality of taxes is the reason we pay them. I prefer to look at them as a public good.There's no question that the government could do with a little weight watchers. I think its bloat makes it sluggish and unresponsive and quite often this is mistaken as being uncaring. We will never see a day when the government becomes slim and fit as it was when the constitution was written. After all the total us population at that time was under four million people. We have twice that many in NYC alone today. Life has become much more complex and the laws reflect that complexity with some corruption, greed and fat thrown in for good measure. What really needs a rewrite is the 1901 Alabama Constitution.GovtrustDropin you a note and hopin you might want see the Sunshine (2007 film) sometime. Of course it would have to come to Birmingham. Ah the golden spacesuits of yore. Also I came across a new documentary of George Romero being released in 2008 and I am legend is coming out although I am sure they will butcher it. I fear Will Smith.Govtrust Aaron Russo is Dead. Govtrust This week on WGOD. Also I love Father Ted that show is great.

William March quick scan
Hi, I saw your request for an A-class review for William March. Prior to evaluation, I quick scan the article for easy to see objections, so that these may be fixed easily before others spend their time reviewing. Here's what I found: Addressing these points would make the chance of William March passing A-class review larger (and of course would make the article better), but of course I haven't done a text review just yet. Er rab ee 08:34, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The image of William March in his 30s (taken from the inside of a book cover) has a wrong tag. It is not the image of a book cover (which is used to identify the book in question), but a generic copyright tag like non-free fair use in should be used, with an appropriate fair use rationale.
 * You might also want to edit the notes, as each should be presented like the references section, but with page numbers added.
 * Hi, I've been very busy lately, so sorry for the delay, but this article has been reviewed (see here). I saw that you changed the copyright tag for that picture and added a fair use rationale, and I won't make it an issue, but I'm afraid it won't pass the copyright police, as there are several free images available for William March (and indeed present in the current article). Just the fact that it was taken in a different time period is not enough, it should reflect some characteristic item in his appearance that is not present in the other images. Er rab ee 23:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use images in userspace

 * You are not allowed to use non-free images that are on Wikipedia under fair use for anything in your userspace, including your user page. I have commented them out.  If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message.  Wickethewok 03:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Sarahparcak.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Sarahparcak.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 21:59, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:HankSR.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:HankSR.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 07:49, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Image:HankSR.jpg
An image that you uploaded, Image:HankSR.jpg, has been listed at because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kaldari (talk) 16:51, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

GA Reassessessment of William March
I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:William March/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 10:02, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Campus Ambassadors wanted in Troy, Alabama
Hi! I'm leaving you this message because you're listed as a Wikipedian in Alabama. The Wikipedia Ambassador Program is currently looking for Campus Ambassadors to help with Wikipedia assignments at Troy University, which will be participating in the Public Policy Initiative for the Spring 2011 semester. The role of Campus Ambassadors will be to provide face-to-face training and support for students on Wikipedia-related skills (how to edit articles, how to add references, etc.). This includes doing in-class presentations, running workshops and labs, possibly holding office hours, and in general providing in-person mentorship for students.

Prior Wikipedia skills are not required for the role, as training will be provided for all Campus Ambassadors (although, of course, being an experienced editor is a plus).

I know Alabama is a big state, but if you happen to live near Troy and you are interested in being a Wikipedia Campus Ambassador, or know someone else from Troy who might be, please email me or leave a message on my talk page.--Sage Ross - Online Facilitator, Wikimedia Foundation (talk) 16:04, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Wmarch1.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Wmarch1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:34, 12 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 08:34, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Celtic F.C. task force
Hello, you have a userbox which suggests you are a fan of Celtic F.C. I am hoping to start up a task force for Celtic at WikiProject Football. If you are interested please reply here. Thanks. Adam4267 (talk) 19:47, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Lovecraft1934.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Lovecraft1934.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC)