User talk:Diarmaidocadhla

Welcome
Hello, Diarmaidocadhla, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I notice that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. To start creating a draft article, just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit that page as you would any other. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

The one firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. It is also worth noting that Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which specifically link them to one company or corporation. If your username does have such a name, it would be advisable for you to request a change of username.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! You can also just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gurt Posh (talk) 15:28, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Xl reports for pegasus opera


The article Xl reports for pegasus opera has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unreferenced; no assertion of notability per WP:GNG; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources; evident WP:Conflict of interest by article's creator

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gurt Posh (talk) 15:31, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

I don't mind if this page is deleted, I wanted to anyway as the title was written with incorrect upper/lower case usage. I'm not sure I understand the criteria here at Wiki, I thought it would be legitimate to simple state what a product was for reference. I will look into this again when I have more time. Many thanks for your attention ... Diarmaidocadhla (talk) 15:42, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ONE Systems


A tag has been placed on ONE Systems requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gurt Posh (talk) 15:33, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Xl reports for pegasus opera also suffers from the above problems. That's not for speedy deletion because of the way the categories work - a company can be speedied for lack of significance, but a product cannot. Products can be speedied if the article is regarded as spam, however. Peridon (talk) 16:02, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Deletion
OK. For a start, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. Then, look at WP:CORP and WP:RS. You have to show that the company has significance, and prove it by reference to independent reliable sources (not the company site, or blogs or self-published stuff like LinkedIn). If you decide you can meet the requirements, create the article on a subpage of your userpage and then ask any regular editor or admin for an opinion. Do look at WP:COI and WP:SPAM too, just in case. You did actually manage fairly neutral wording (about which see WP:NPOV). It was the lack of apparent significance and referencing that was the problem. Peridon (talk) 15:59, 5 September 2011 (UTC)