User talk:Dibash6396

October 2021
Hello, I'm Njd-de. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Media of India have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. afpr.co.in – NJD-DE (talk) 22:13, 25 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't think you Belong from India, If you would belong from India then I am sure you would have heard the name of AFPR, They Have been in Local News in TV For Authorizing as a Relevant Job News Agency Dibash6396 (talk) 22:24, 25 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Also they are A Non Profit Organization for research and Development Google Search AFPR, Adhyayan Foundation For Policy And Research (AFPR)
 * I will write a article about them Dibash6396 (talk) 22:25, 25 October 2021 (UTC)


 * It doesn't matter where I come from. That website is spam. I will post another notice here with helpful links as it appears you have a financial interest in promoting that website. – NJD-DE (talk) 22:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Information.svg Hello Dibash6396. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.


 * Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.


 * Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Dibash6396. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: . If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. – NJD-DE (talk) 22:29, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

I am not being directly paid for this, I thought this would be mass intrest as they were in television Dibash6396 (talk) 22:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. You clearly have a connection with that website afpr.co.in, even if not financial. – NJD-DE (talk) 12:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)