User talk:Dibya Of Reading

June 2021
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. Please do not sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article? Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Sungodtemple (talk) 12:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rimowa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. – NJD-DE (talk) 12:30, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for your valuable information. I will mind it next time. Dibya Of Reading (talk) 12:59, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Big City Plan, you may be blocked from editing. SunDawn (talk) 06:49, 14 June 2021 (UTC)  You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 07:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article, or a draft for a Wikipedia article, about yourself, at Dibya Ranjan Giri. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 08:39, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Dibya Ranjan Giri (author) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dibya Ranjan Giri (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dibya Ranjan Giri (author) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nearlyevil 665  12:51, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

This article is true about Dibya Ranjan Giri. It's absolutely legal. Dibya Of Reading (talk) 13:19, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

The article Dibya Ranjan Giri (author) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines it should not be deleted.

Dibya Of Reading (talk) 16:20, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * As the notice above says, the discussion is happening on Articles for deletion/Dibya Ranjan Giri (author), not here on your talk page. Wikipedia's general notability guidelines (WP:GNG) recommend a minimum of two separate people writing something substantive pulished in a reliable source. Nobody, not even you, has found even one reliable source mentioning the subject, and definitely not anything substantive.
 * Actually, as I look over the article, I actually see lots of problems in it. Even if the subject were appropriate for an article, this article needs a lot of of work to make it ready for publishing. Spelling and grammar, neutral point of view, verifiable sources, inline references, links in and out, formatting -- and of course the actual content -- should be to a good standard. There's also the Conflict of Interest (WP:COI) guidelines to follow.
 * If you want to help Wikipedia, I would encourage you to build a solid foundation of meaningful small improvements before you try to write a whole article from scratch. There's a lot to learn, and it's easier to learn in small pieces along the way. And there is plenty of help available!
 * Heavy Joke (talk) 06:58, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * If you want to help Wikipedia, I would encourage you to build a solid foundation of meaningful small improvements before you try to write a whole article from scratch. There's a lot to learn, and it's easier to learn in small pieces along the way. And there is plenty of help available!
 * Heavy Joke (talk) 06:58, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Heavy Joke (talk) 06:58, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dibya Ranjan Giri


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Dibya Ranjan Giri. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 08:38, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dibya Ranjan Giri (writer)


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at Dibya Ranjan Giri (writer). Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 12:02, 30 June 2021 (UTC)  You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 13:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Dibya Ranjan Giri&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Dibya Ranjan Giri. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Amanda (she/her)  18:28, 10 April 2022 (UTC)