User talk:Dicksonlaprade

Recent edit to John Stossel
Even though I am a huge John Stossel fan, agree with 99% of his opinions, and hate to see him criticized, I wanted to say your recent addition to the criticism section of his article was very well done. :-) Lawyer2b 20:53, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Regarding Afd
You just recently added an Afd for Consensus science and I just wanted to let you know that you forgot to make a new AfD page for the article. You had added the old RfA from nearly two years ago by accident, I guess.

Anyway, I fixed it up and created a new AfD, which can be seen here.

Happy editing!

--  Nishkid64  Talk Contribs   17:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Heh, no problem. I just wanted to tell you that you should put the reason why you tagged it for deletion again. Go here and edit the page stating why you wanted to delete it. Be sure to read WP:NN so you'll be able to give a valid reason for why it should be deleted (usually you should state a violation of a Wikipedia rule like saying "Fails WP:BIO", etc.) --  Nishkid64  Talk  18:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Great job with the AfD
Hey, I just wanted to tell you that you did a great job with trying to convince people about Consensus science. It seems like the article will be deleted soon (probably will be relisted first). You put up some compelling arguments that really garnered the support of others.

However, I just wanted to tell you that you are not allowed to edit old AfD's as you did with the first AfD of Consensus science. It says on the article "Do not modify".

I just wanted to tell you before you do it again and get in trouble with the administrators here on Wikipedia.

The AfD for Consensus science will run for a total of five days, before any final decision is made. It probably will be deleted, as of now, but let's just wait and see.

Thanks, and happy editing!

-- Nish kid 64 15:20, 30 August 2006 (UTC)