User talk:Dicraft788

Your submission at Articles for creation: Fatima Feng (TV series) (November 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Ratnahastin were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Fatima Feng (TV series) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Fatima_Feng_(TV_series) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Ratnahastin&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Fatima_Feng_(TV_series) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ratnahastin (talk) 13:22, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Ratnahastin But The All sources are reliable and Maintained.This Article is with Details and Everything is in the circle of Wikipedia standard.Please Take a look again and accept it. Dicraft788 (talk) 13:42, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Copyright and Wikipedia
Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Love Life Ka Law has been accepted
 Love Life Ka Law, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Love_Life_Ka_Law help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Xegma (talk) 09:19, 17 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Xegma Thanks Dicraft788 (talk) 10:18, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

November 2023
Your edit to Love Life Ka Law has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. ''Please don't copy text from other websites. It's a copyright violation and something that is taken very seriously here. You must summarize and rewrite, completely in your own words, the material. It would be helpful if you review any other articles to check if you copy-paste into any other articles.''  Ravensfire  (talk) 14:55, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Nauman335. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 16:02, 17 November 2023 (UTC)


 * @Bbb23 {{unblock|reason=I Accept that Nauman335 was my account but From This Account I'm making just good faith edits. I'm not doing any Violations which make me block from Wikipedia.Please Unblock Me from Wikipedia. Dicraft788 (talk) 16:07, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * @Bbb23

{{unblock reviewed |1=I Accept that Nauman335 was my account but From This Account I'm making just good faith edits. I'm not doing any Violations which make me block from Wikipedia.Please Unblock Me from Wikipedia |decline = Every edit is bad faith and you clearly know this. Every edit violates WP:EVADE. Every edit violates WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 16:24, 17 November 2023 (UTC)}}

Unblock request
Dicraft788 (talk) 19:32, 17 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Immediately above you admit to socking. Lavalizard101 (talk) 18:10, 19 November 2023 (UTC)