User talk:Dicttrshp

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- intgr [talk] 13:28, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Lolcat
No problem! That's how we learn to edit...you should see some of the stupid stuff I did in my first couple days. And actually, most of your edits were fine--such as the Pussycat Dolls thing, I had been wanting to delete that anyway.

As for the ceiling cat bit, I agree that there's currently no reason for it to be in the article, but I'm keeping it in there as a commented-out section because I think it is salvageable (ie, someone who wants to may be able to integrate that section into the article better, especially if a trustworthy third-party source ever discusses ceiling cat and other "recurring characters" of lolcats)--it's not something I personally have any interest in taking the time to do, but I figure it should be kept in there in case anyone does want to do it.

Also, one other little thing... you don't need to use  when starting a new paragraph; the new material will show up on its own line if you just double-space it after the previous paragraph. What I usually use for is if I want to start a separate line inside a table cell, within a footnote, or part of a bulleted list or something, since double-spacing in those kinds of preformatted templates usually don't let you double-space inside of them.

Again, thanks for helping clean up the article! If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask; I myself am pretty new here, but will try to help if I can. --Politizer (talk) 17:36, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Khojali
I have reverted your edits on Khojali disambiguation page. Please see the talkpage for justification. Also note that my first justification was aimed at Atabek and was there before your first edit on that article. VartanM (talk) 05:47, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Redirects
Please don't blank articles and redirect them without discussion, and should such an action be necessary please don't mark your edit as "minor". Minor edits are those that don't change the contents. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 17:41, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Thanks for fixing it. ·:· Will Beback  ·:· 10:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:19, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Simon Speed (talk) 21:31, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Hi, a lot of material was removed without comment and there was at least one sourced fact there. I'm not personally totally happy with all the claims on this page but if you want to make controversial edits please discuss them on the talk page first and try to reach a consensus with other editors. --Simon Speed (talk) 21:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

At least this time you have justified your actions in the edit summary. Without that most editors would assume a drive-by deletion attack on the article (vandalism of the sex related articles is almost continuous and editors who watch them develop a revert reflex). You now should justify your actions on the discussion page. --Simon Speed (talk) 01:23, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:37, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

2007 Lebanon conflict
There is no discussion recorded on the talk page of the article because we discussed it on our own talk pages,and there is no discussion on my talk page because I was using another username two years ago. I change my username every few months because I get bored with them. I forgot which username I used back then.BobaFett85 (talk) 21:17, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

I added three sources in the infobox, the US military provided the Lebanese Army military suplies: night-vision gogles, rifles, ammunition, explosives. The US government put Fatah al-Islam on their terror list. And many experts said that Fatah al-Islam may have had some loose conections with al-Qaeda or was at least heavily influenced by it if not connected.BobaFett85 (talk) 04:22, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 06:11, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Pandemic (South Park)
Hi. Can you offer your opinion on the conflict described here? Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 00:53, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:36, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

Peruvians in the United Kingdom
Hi, I noticed your comments on the talk page for Peruvians in the United Kingdom which I have since attempted to expand. I would appreciate further comments of these changes. Thanks Stevvvv4444 (talk) 11:25, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)