User talk:Didchat

Welcome!

Hello, Didchat, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Vickie Walber, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Tchaliburton (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Vickie Walber


A tag has been placed on Vickie Walber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tchaliburton (talk) 05:55, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Vickie Walber has been reverted. Your edit here to Vickie Walber was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/pages/Angel-of-the-Flesh/184443911633844?ref=ts) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 06:08, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vickie Walber


The article Vickie Walber has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:56, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Let me explain
I'm Qwyrxian, and admin here at Wikipedia. Let me explain what happened. I decided that Vickie Walber is just barely sufficient to pass by WP:CSD, which is a criteria we have that allows us to rapidly delete articles on people, companies, etc., that have no evidence of importance. Having said that, I believe that the article will almost certainly be deleted anyway--it will just take a little longer. First, I have right now nominated for deletion under WP:BLPPROD. This is a strict, unbreakable rule that says that all articles about living people must have at least one reliable source to verify some information in them. If such a source is not found in 7 days, the article must be deleted.

Should you or someone else find such a source, there is still the bigger question of whether or not Walber is notable. Generally, this means that multiple independent reliable sources have talked about her in detail. A quick search of some of the things in that article didn't turn up anything; however, if you know of such sources, please add them to the article.

If you have questions, please come to my talk page and leave them there, and I will be happy to answer them. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:59, 18 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh, a side note: Facebook is not a reliable source, and, in general, we don't allow any links to facebook in Wikipedia articles (there's a few exceptions, but they don't apply to the page on the book). Qwyrxian (talk) 08:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Verissa Walber for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Verissa Walber is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Verissa Walber until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. StAnselm (talk) 03:29, 15 May 2012 (UTC)