User talk:Diego Antolini

December 2017
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Globally renamed 'The x-plan' to 'Diego Antolini'. For technical reasons usernames cannot contain the '@'character. Just Chilling (talk) 21:32, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Good morning Alex, thanks for unblocking my account and renaming it. I cannot find the material I had uploaded before the blocking of my previous user name. Has it been lost? Shall I restart again from the beginning? I would also like to know if I can use this "talk" space to ask you and other administrators for advices as I insert the material, or not? Of course I am going to read Wikipedia more carefully and abide by the conditions posed by Dlohcerekim. Regards.

Good morning, I am reviewing the article I would like to submit for approval but I still haven't clear in my mind whether I can write about a Research Group I am part of (of course from an objective standpoint and with all due references from newspapers articles and organizations other than blogs) or only a third party can write such entries? I would like to have the opportunity to have my article reviewed by you without my account being blocked again, that is why I am asking. Thanks for your support Best Regards Diego Antolini

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:The X-Plan Group


A tag has been placed on Draft:The X-Plan Group, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Bishonen &#124; talk 17:10, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

January 2018
You may also want to bear in mind: Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause. – Athaenara ✉  08:27, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Dear Athaneara, thanks for the remark, I believe Wikipedia should be here to tell the world about the world with all its notable endeavors. As far as I understand, the keyword here is not ego, it is notability of sources. And that is my focus.

Your draft article, Draft:The Cry of the Sibyll


Hello, Diego Antolini. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Cry of the Sibyll".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. DannyS712 (talk) 08:20, 6 April 2019 (UTC)

Draft:The Cry of the Sibyll concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Cry of the Sibyll, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:23, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Cry of the Sibyll


Hello, Diego Antolini. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Cry of the Sibyll".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia!  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 05:21, 21 October 2019 (UTC)