User talk:Diego Moya/Archive 3

"description of Custer Revenge"
is there: Custer's Revenge. So, why do you think is this the only game that needs to be described in the whole article? The article says "elements of rape" anyway. --94.246.154.130 (talk) 22:32, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That's OK. Now that you have provided a rationale in the edit summary, I can see that it has merit. See how this works? ;-) Diego Moya (talk) 22:48, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q2 2011
–MuZemike 14:14, 7 July 2011 (UTC)

A common problem
Dear Wikipedist editor, I want to submit to your attention an our common problem: disruptive contributions and edit warring operated by user Derek farn (talk). This latter shows systematically a provoking behaviour and lacking of respect for other people’s work, typical of vandalism. I’ve sent this communication to many people having the same problem in order to organize a collective protest/action request directed to e.g. the Arbitration Committee or Requests for comment/User conduct (this latter procedure requires the participation of at least two users) or to the Wikipedia Community. If you agree with this initiative please contact me at this dedicated email address: clipeaster-1971 AT yahoo DOT com. In order to avoid creating of a forum section dedicated to Derek farn I suggest you to delete this communication once you’ve read it and, then, be in contact via email. Any suggestion are welcomed. I look forward to hearing from you. Best regards, Structuralgeol (talk) 17:37, 15 July 2011 (UTC).
 * As another user pointed out to me that suggesting to be in contact outside wikipedia is not a correct way, for transparency reasons, so I conclude that we need to correspond via talk page. Best regards, Structuralgeol (talk) 02:29, 16 July 2011 (UTC).

Please comment on Talk:O.B.I.T.
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:O.B.I.T.. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:19, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bon Iver, Bon Iver
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bon Iver, Bon Iver. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 06:48, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Contributions to Interaction Design
Hey there Diego, I see you undid my revision removing the Universities with Interaction Design artciles and quoted the five pillars. You may have been right or wrong to do it, honestly I'm not sure. I know some of the changes I have made are rather extreme, but I am rather confused as to why you re-added them. My reasoning for removing them was that they don't seem to provide anything useful to the article. The only time I can think it was useful is when someone is looking for a school to study Interaction Design and that would be much better served by another tool.

As I was saying earlier, I may be completely in the wrong here, but I can't see I good reason for keeping them. If you would mind enlightening me as to there usefulness I would be less confused.

(please reply on my talk or on the Interaction Design page) Thanks Stevie. (resigned, had to log on) Gnepets (talk) 08:43, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar :p
haha, I ran into the feature and thought it was awesome, think I will start using more in the future ^_^. But I used it legitimately, more than just because it was there. Gnepets (talk) 09:06, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Same here. It feels a little bit silly to be motivated by this, but it works! Diego (talk) 09:08, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

FLC
I just wanted to say thank you for your input at Featured list candidates/List of songs in Rock Band 3/archive1, which has now passed. The list is now much better than it was at the start of the FLC, and your input helped make it as good as it is now! –Drilnoth (T/C) 14:53, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electric power transmission
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Electric power transmission. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 11:09, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

Cleanup after Tog
I'm happy to have someone with more time and interest clean up after him, but please minimally give the material proper weight and remove extraneous information. Better yet, find better and independent sources so it's easier to follow NPOV. Thanks! --Ronz (talk) 04:07, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't understand your whole reverts of the material added to the articles. They can be seen as undue weight, but that would call for trimming the text, not removing the references completely. The links your deleted come from a reliable source that is independent with respect to the topics of "Usability testing‎‎" and "Power user", so I don't see the need to find a different source to include the concepts as long as they're given proper weight. Diego (talk) 15:58, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Let's give them proper weight. --Ronz (talk) 17:31, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Beard
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Beard. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 23:35, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Faceted classification
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Faceted classification. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! However, please note that your input will carry no greater weight than anyone else's: remember that an RFC aims to reach a reasoned consensus position, and is not a vote. In support of that, your contribution should focus on thoughtful evaluation of the issues and available evidence, and provide further relevant evidence if possible.

''You have received this notice because your name is on Feedback request service. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from that page.'' RFC&#32;bot (talk) 14:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)

WP Computer Science in the Signpost
"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Computer Science for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Other editors will also have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 02:17, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Video game behavioral effects/Video Game controversy merger
Hey Diego, looking at merging the two articles above. I see you reverted a previous merger, suggesting not enough material had been merged. I've looked over the two pages, and they appear largely redundant to me. There was one section on theory that I merged over to video game controversy. The other page on video game behavioral effects appears to have more problems with POV. It could be edited for that, but I think the result would simply be redundant with Video Game Controversy. Since you reverted the previous merger you're obviously a stakeholder and I welcome your comments. Let me know what else might need to be merged, or of course you can just merge it. :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.91.76.208 (talk) 15:54, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Note to Deigo
Sir, as an annomoyus contributer, with an extrodonary long backround history, I must point out there are only two people I have ever heard say these words: "Note to self." You and Ted Nelson. I will assure you, that from your ideas, I can see you have earned the same respect and admiration.

I read your comment on modeless cut and paste, and am familuar with UI. The best way to test it is to find the youngest person capabile of understanding the concept, and asking them how it should work, then trying your solution, and seeing the gap. Learning aside, if it is not obivous how it sould work, then as an alternative to instruction, you may move the metaphor closer to what should be obivous, but then that leaves out, with the tiny placement of an idea( like when you put something in the clipboard, its hidden ), you have empowered the user with a breakthrough ( Nominal realism ).

Please provide more links to your work, like cut and paste you never know if something like 'pipe' or 'flower-hose' will take over the world. -AOT — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.5.27.97 (talk) 21:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

Italics
Use them. Also, don't repeat the same internal links again and again! --194.145.185.229 (talk) 17:03, 30 December 2011 (UTC)

Use italics in the Titles man. And don't use the same same same internal links in the articles (it's overlinking). Like you're doing here ("Resident Evil", "Half-Life 2", "Halo" and "NPC sidekick, NPC sidekick, NPC sidekick" etc.). If you click on these links it's written as Resident Evil and such, so stop being nonconformist/lazy/whatever.--194.145.185.229 (talk) 12:56, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You mean overlinking as in WP:OVERLINK, the guideline that states "if helpful for readers, links may be repeated in infoboxes, tables, image captions..."?
 * You're right about the italic in titles. I wasn't aware that it's the preferred form for video-games. Diego (talk) 13:20, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Really? Seriously? You never noticed? Wow. Yeah, it can be repeated in the table... once, after the link was used elsewhere in the article (outside of the table). --194.145.185.229 (talk) 13:32, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Because you say so? If you're so sure that there's a better way by which people can follow the link to an article related to one particular character in the list, why don't you just fix it instead of posing riddles? Diego (talk) 13:39, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

No, because that's how we roll here. And now you know. --194.145.185.229 (talk) 13:40, 3 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Still not sure what your half sayings mean. Diego (talk) 13:46, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

That is how the guidelines are set here. OK? --194.145.185.229 (talk) 14:03, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I'll do my own interpretation of the text appearing in the guidelines, thank you very much. Diego (talk) 14:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

The WikiProject Video Games Newsletter, Q4 2011
MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 06:19, 6 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Supermushroom.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Supermushroom.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 17:18, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Pacman-cutscene.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pacman-cutscene.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 17:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your contribution to the discussion. I had not thought of using that image on cutscene, and it clearly appears to satisfy the NFCC requirements.  Therefore, I have withdrawn my nomination for deletion of the image.  However, I have opened up a discussion at WP:NFCR to discuss whether the image should stay in the power-up article.  Your contributions are welcome.  RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 21:10, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

The no consensus close
I guess my main issue is that the template being closed as no consensus leaves it open to renomination. It would be simple for someone to nominate it for deletion with canvassing as the concern. SL93 (talk) 00:17, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * What needs to be done to make ARS more effective is to ban assholes that don't bother to search for sources. I can't think of a polite word because they make me angry. I hate searching for a around 5 minutes and showing the nominator plenty of sources that they could have already found easily. SL93 (talk) 00:19, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * That would be a great first step. :-) Diego (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!
Thank you :)  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Natkabrown (talk • contribs) 18:23, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. :-) Diego (talk) 18:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Fractal dimension/Accesible version, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Euclidean and Sets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

How do you close discussion threads at the rescue list?

 * (Received from you on my talk page...)

Hello, Northamerica1000. Is there a template that you use to create this type of collapsible table to close threads, or do you copy-paste the wikicode each time? Diego (talk) 17:29, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Response: The tables are added manually; unaware of a template that would accomplish this. Northamerica1000 (talk) 06:17, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Supermushroom.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Supermushroom.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:10, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tux kart power-up.png
Thanks for uploading File:Tux kart power-up.png, which you've sourced to http://pabloarroyo.wordpress.com/2010/01/page/2/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 22:33, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Gina Rinehart
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Gina Rinehart. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service. — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 05:15, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

My responses to your comments
Due to my block, and the requirement for me to force fragment the discussion I have responded to your comments on my talk page. --Kumioko (talk) 11:59, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Environment
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Environment. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Feedback request service.'' — RFC&#32;bot (talk) 00:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)