User talk:Diegocr

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully.

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.
 * Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Wikipedia's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Wikipedia again.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?


 * What can I do now?

If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Daniel Case (talk) 21:56, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

I'm afraid I cannot agree with the account you give of your editing. You didn't "merely [add] a link": every edit you have ever made (apart from this unblock request) has added links related in one way or another to your software. That means that the sole purpose of the account appears to be to call attention to your software. You say that you will "just stop from adding any further link pointing to software updates", but can you be more specific, and undertake not to add any links where you may have a conflict of interest, whether to updates or not? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Just for the sake of clarification, i'm an individual and hence the account is personal, i'm not a company, the software is 100% freeware and therefore i won't get any monetary gratification regardless if the program gets any attention or no, i've added them to provide content and/or references to its existence, but anyway feel free to remove all my edits, i don't really care. In any case, just edited my initial answer. Cheers. Diegocr (talk) 22:18, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
 * One can still promote something that's free. Money is not the sole motivation to promote something; oftentimes the recognition or attention from doing so is the reward. — Jeremy  v^_^v  Bori! 20:29, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi DangerousPanda, how that declined due no response? I've already replied to James and did what he told me to do, so... huh? Diegocr (talk) 17:35, 11 April 2014 (UTC)