User talk:Diegomgarcia

Image tagging for Image:Joelmchale2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Joelmchale2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 19:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:100_2074.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:100_2074.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  16:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:IMG_1405.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IMG_1405.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  16:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:JoelMchale.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:JoelMchale.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  16:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

File:JoelMchale.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:JoelMchale.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Nv8200p talk 16:51, 21 October 2009 (UTC)

Stu Vetter
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Stu Vetter, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.stuvetter.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:09, 23 December 2009 (UTC)


 * As a matter of legal policy, we cannot accept material that violates copyright. If you get approval to use material from Stu Vetter's website, you can create a new article. Or just draft an article of your own based on newspaper and magazine articles about Vetter. Good luck. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 07:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stu Vetter
A tag has been placed on Stu Vetter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 > haneʼ 06:05, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. --SineBot (talk) 08:11, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2021
Your edit to Best Friends Animal Society has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 16:01, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Roy Schwartz, Axios moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Roy Schwartz, Axios, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Liliana UwU (talk / contributions) 06:43, 28 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Not sure how to make it suitable, but every line has a link to a reliable site which verifies the information. Diegomgarcia (talk) 06:47, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Roy Schwartz, Axios
Hello, Diegomgarcia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Roy Schwartz, Axios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 31 July 2023 (UTC)