User talk:Diegotrazzi/Archive

The page you created
Hey Diego, I moved the page you created to User:Diegotrazzi, since it seemed to be about you. To have your own Wikipedia article, you must meet the criteria outlined in WP:BIO, which I don't think you do. However, as a registered user you can have a userpage. Hope this OK with you, and happy editing :). Fabricationary 05:00, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Regarding your edit to Diego Trazzi:
Your recent edit to Diego Trazzi (diff) was reverted by automated bot. You have been identified as a new user or a logged out editor using a shared IP address to add email addresses, phone numbers, YouTube, Geocities, Myspace, Facebook, blog, or forum links to a page. Please note that such links are generally to be avoided. You can restore any other content by editing the page and re-adding that content. The links can be reviewed and restored by established users. Thank you for contributing! // VoABot II 05:27, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * You have recently re-created the article Diego Trazzi, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. Danny Lilithborne 05:34, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Stop adding your pictures to articles. See Wikipedia's image use policy, and discuss adding new pictures in their respective talk pages. Danny Lilithborne 05:51, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:3RR on Sydney
It seems like you might be sitting on 3 reverts. If you go for a 4th and break the 3 revert rule you can actually be blocked. Your gallery of images doesn't have a place on the SYdney article. Perhaps 1 or 2 might be appropriate but clear vanity edits (promotional too?) should not be made to an encyclopedia. Furthermore, while the pictures show considerable technical skill, and some artistic skill, their 'intepretative' nature does not necessarily make them appropriate for an encyclopedic article on Sydney. In what way are they describing or aiding the article? Merbabu 05:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Ditto for Taipei. Wait, you're already past your third revert. Consider this a last warning before I log you on the 3RR noticeboard. Danny Lilithborne 05:58, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Diego, I've blocked you for 24 hours for disruptive editing. You've been edit warring (and breached 3RR) on multiple articles. Adding fifteen images to any article, but especially ones with several existing images, is disruptive and a nuisance for people without fast internet connections. Please don't do this. Also, please don't insert your name into articles. Photographers receive credit on the image information page and it is not standard for credit to also be given in the article itself. You seem to be trying to use Wikipedia as a vehicle for self-promotion, which is completely unacceptable. It would be helpful, but not mandatory, if you didn't ignore messages other editors leave you. I probably would not have blocked you if you had replied to some of these messages to indicate you understood and agreed to stop edit warring over including your photos, writing vanity articles, etc. Unfortunately due to your failure to respond to mesages, your repeated reposting of images after you were asked to stop, and your reposting your bio into the mainspace after you were told this was inappropriate because it fails bio guidelines, this seems to be the only way to get your attention. We welcome your contributions here on Wikipedia, but you need to follow our guidelines and policies. Sarah Ewart 14:56, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

---

All right / So how do I respond to messages if you blocked me ?????? I re-posted the photos because I thought somebody bad had deleted my images, I didn't know was the administrator. When I realized that I tryied to follow the rules, deleting my name from them, but you ( or somebody else ) deleted my photos anyway !!! I am very upset about this situation. I spent more than half day to make a good job, and upload and post a lot of nice pictures of the beautiful Sydney and Taipei. Whant is the maximun number of photos you can upload for a page ???? Is not fair to keep deleting my photographs. It is not fair. I also tryied to upload some photo on the TAIPEI gallery without my name, buyt you, careless, just deleted them. So, if you benned me, how do I answer the maessages ??????? I don't understand, becuse I read the policy and I haven't found a good reason why I coudn't add a gallery to the Sydney page. The thumbails are not that heavy and other cities have Galleries, so y not sydney ? How am I "disruptive and a nuisance for people without fast internet connections" if I add a gallery to Sudney ? Is it because I am a new user ? Is it because I uploaded a lot of photos all at one ? ? Or is it because I pissed you off ? IMPORTANT: please don't miss-understand me. I AM TRYING TO HELP THE COMMUNITY, I AM NOT DISTRUPTIVE !! I didn't delete any other image, I just added some hoera house photos and nice things I loved of Sydney. ON TOP OF THAT I WANT TO CLIRIFY THAT I AM NOT TRYING TO MAKE SELF-PROMOTION, I AM NOT SELLING ANYTHING, I JUST PUT A GNU license ON ALL OF MY PHOTO. On top of that, you shoudn't say I am "writing vanity articles, etc" Two more things: how can you define a photo "'intepretative'" ??? where do you saw the interpertative aspct of these photo ??? If you have a good reason to say that, than say it and please specify which one... you can't just delete everything !! Last thing, I want to wish you a merry Xmas even if I am very upset, but I hope everybody will be happy at lest the Xmas day.
 * You respond as you did here. Blocked users are still able to edit their own talk pages. I have your talk page on my watchlist so when you post, I will come back as soon as I can.
 * I did not delete any of your images. I have had nothing at all to do with removing or reverting any of your edits. I simply reviewed your account history. Wikipedia is a collaborative project. This means that editors work together. You must be willing to discuss edits with fellow editors. It is possible (not guaranteed) that if you go to the talk page of the articles you want to add images to and suggest your pictures, they might agree to add one or two, but as I said before, fifteen is simply too many.
 * "Vanity article" is the term we use for articles people who are not notable write about themselves.
 * Please explain what you mean by: "how can you define a photo "'intepretative'" ??? where do you saw the interpertative aspct of these photo ???" I do not understand what that means.
 * I am willing to unblock you if I can be sure that you understand that what you were doing before is disruptive and you agree to try to discuss with other editors instead of ignoring them.
 * Just reply here and I'll come back later. Sarah Ewart 17:44, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
 * P.S. You aren't banned, just temporarily blocked. Sarah Ewart 17:44, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Diego, have a look at this page I made for you Gallery. You can put all your images in your gallery which is linked to from your userpage. Also, I reviewed your deletion review request. I think you might be confused about Wikipedia. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. For people to get an article in the mainspace, they have to be considered notable. People don't just get articles because they contribute. I don't have an article Sarah Ewart and I'm an administrator who has contributed many thousands of edits. Others above have given you some links and I would like you to read them because I think you will continue to get into trouble otherwise. I would particularly like you to read WP:BIO which explains who should have an article written about them. Sarah Ewart 18:05, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

---RE:- I read the Article you suggested me, and I understand I am not noticble enoght to get an article. But, please... explain, because I would like to upload some images on the Taipei page, which has a gallery. + I don't understand the reason why if "Taipei"has a Gallery section in the main page, Sydney can't. And I would like to understand why you deleted all of my pictures, even if I tried to upload them without writing my name on it. I don't think that ALL of the picture I uploaded are personal interpretative poit of view of the reality, or, damaging anybodyelse. Same thing with the Taipei images, what's wrong with them ?? I spent lot of time to take this photos and produce quality work.... what's wrong with this photos ? How about if in the Sydney page we just make a link to a gallery page, so that if somebody wants to see the phtos can just click on it ? Thank you.
 * Diego, please try to understand me. I did not delete your photos or revert or remove any of your edits. Other people removed your pictures from the articles, but they have not been deleted. Please click here Gallery and see. My advice to you is you post a message on Talk:Sydney asking the editors there to look at your photos and agree to adding some to the page. The problem is not with your photos but with your behaviour, edit warring and trying to force the others to have an extra fifteen images on the article. Sarah Ewart 00:24, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Block
For how long Am I goiing to be blocked for ?? 24hrs has been passed alreday .... what happent ??? did I said something wrong ? I am not a terrorist, man ! you are treting me like a criminal, but I am not. This is supposed to be the encyclopedia for everybody ... I am sorry if I did something wrong.... but is it fair to keep me blocked like this ?? -__- merry xmans
 * Your block will expire 24 hours from: 14:33 GMT, December 23 - in about four minutes. Guy (Help!) 14:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Blanking your talk page
Please don't blank your talk page as a means to hide your previous activity and warnings. --Steve (Slf67)talk 23:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

RE: Blanking your talk page
What ? then how about archiving it ? ?? Sorry, but since this story was ended, I tought was a good idea to archeive or delete these text. Do I have to leave it there forever ?