User talk:DieselEstate

Welcome
Regarding the Wikipedia page: Lynching. I would very much like the description "extra-judicial punishment" changed to something more appropriate, indeed, more accurate like, extra-judicial murder or, extra-judicial killing. Perhaps the term extra-judicial should be dispensed with completely. After all, extra-judicial is largely unnecessary, especially if the term of either killing or murder is employed. I feel most strongly that punishment is a term which dilutes and muddies the pure horror and injustice of lynching. The term punishment conveys none of the finality of lynching. For younger people especially, maybe researching home work assignments, punishment is relative to being grounded (the lucky ones who are not beaten and/or abused themselves). I simply wish to fully convey, in the most proper way, the awful terror, the painful suffering, which lynchings imprinted upon the victim, their families, and friends. Those repercussions are still permeating down the decades - affecting people connected by family because - not only was the main periods of lynching not that long ago but, lynching's never actually stopped

January 2016
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=698683185 your edit] to Head over Heels (Cocteau Twins album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
 * | rev1 = AllMuv1Score =  {{cite web|last=Raggett |first=Ned |url={{Allmusic|class=album |

Corrections
I fail to understand just why people feel the need to complain about corrections made to established pages which contain poor grammar. Whilst English is very much a progressive language, there are definite rights, and wrongs. It is ridiculous to leave mistakes on pages, simply because that is what the original writer intended. The Americans in particular, are mangling our beautiful language, with sheer stupidity. For example: Obligated - there is no such word. The correct word is: Obliged. Why should we not tell them so? In fact, the poison which is American television and cinema, is saturating the English speaking world (particularly those who are learning English) with the most arrogantly idiotic laziness which, when corrected, blithely state: Oh, that's American English. Those of us who know better, recognise 'American English' as an oxymoron. If this correction in favour of mistakes continues, I'll have no option but to leave Wikipedia. I daresay I shall not be missed. DieselEstate (talk) 16:58, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Unspecified source/license for File:Shaun Ryder.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Shaun Ryder.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like PD-self (to release all rights), (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (Talk • Contribs • Owner) 19:45, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Weird Wikipedia Search Result
Apologies for the repetition. There is an inappropriate, rude nastiness appearing in the blurb of a search result for "The Spike" essay by George Orwell. Anyone, please help me to delete it? It is only returned +/- 1 in 5 times of a search. Seemingly linked to ru website although, I am not suggesting they are responsible. DieselEstate (talk) 07:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)