User talk:Difort

Additions of http://.flashmoto.com
Please do not add advertising or inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. --Hu12 (talk) 14:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mint editor


The article Mint editor has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable product. Lacks reliable sources and therefore fails WP:PRODUCT.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 14:40, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mint editor
I have nominated Mint editor, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mint editor. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 12:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

Re: iStockPhoto
You tagged this as CSD G11; I declined it because the article didn't need a complete rewrite and the company is fairly established so I'm fairly certain reliable sources can be found. In any case, the article has had active editing for a while; deletions for non-BLP articles that have existed for long time need to be discussed, and speedy deletion only exists for uncontroversially deletable material. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 13:51, 7 February 2011 (UTC)