User talk:Digana

Juana Inés de la Cruz
Nothing to do with me as such; I was simply reverting a deletion of references by a random IP with no reason given. I have no knowledge or interest in the subject, I was just reverting what I saw as possible deletion-vandalism. Half Shadow  05:03, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

TI Keys
Attempts to circumvent the action the WMF office has taken will be met with the same response; reversion, suppression, and blocking. Mentioning that the keys have been reposted should be ok, however the article we have should not be part of a breadcrumb link trail to the keys - regardless of the length of the trail. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 21:13, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I'm wondering why you bothered to ask me this question when you'd already posted the domain at which the keys are posted to the article. I've requested that oversight remove these revisions, and want to make it very clear that circumvention of an OFFICE action can and will result in a block of indefinite length. The information you posted makes finding the keys extremely easy. Please avoid editing this article. Thank you. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 21:21, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, "be bold", they say. Can I restore my edits without putting the domain name? I'll try to figure out another way to identify that person who reposted the keys; they did so kinda anonymously. Swap (talk) 21:22, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Be bold does not apply when there are legal issues involved. Please do not edit this article further. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 21:26, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Very well, can I ask a friend to do so for me, instructing them to be careful to not mention the domain name nor any information other than a vague indication that the keys are available again online, somewhere? Swap (talk) 21:30, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No. We can't stop someone from looking it up online, but we don't need to actually mention that fact. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 21:40, 3 March 2010 (UTC)


 * As far as "needing", we don't need an article at all, but the article is certainly outdated as it is, since it doesn't mention that TI didn't respond to the counter-claim and that someone reposted the keys. Swap (talk) 21:43, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.