User talk:Digimanst

Speedy deletion nomination of Singtel CIS (Corporate Individual Scheme)


A tag has been placed on Singtel CIS (Corporate Individual Scheme), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Gaijin42 (talk) 00:32, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave two references, one was a dead link and the other did not mention your company. The article is otherwise unsourced, although it seems to be based on the scheme's own website, hardly an independent third-party source.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * I can see nothing factual about the scheme, such as the cost to the company or the level of take-up, it's just promoting the scheme
 * You just list the supposed benefits, as described by the scheme itself(!), but there is no independent verification of these, or any hint of drawbacks.
 * Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: ...exclusive phone models, competitive price plans and free value-added services... offered to selected companies to raise employee satisfaction... may result in various benefits including reduced turnover and higher employee productivity... enjoying savings

In its current form it's basically a fact-free promotion of the scheme either unsourced or based uncritically on the scheme's own website Jimfbleak - talk to me?  10:04, 10 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Text is here. Remember that you have no working references that support anything you have said about the scheme. Also note that having sections headed "Benefits" is a high-risk strategy Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:58, 11 June 2015 (UTC)


 * I made this edit to tidy up. It looks much better, move to article space when you are ready. use the "move" button, don't cut-and-paste. Unless it's resolved, restore the merge template when you do so (double at end) Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  12:55, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Singtel CIS (Corporate Individual Scheme) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Singtel CIS (Corporate Individual Scheme) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Singtel CIS (Corporate Individual Scheme) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gaijin42 (talk) 14:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)