User talk:Digirami/Archive 2

Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito
Hi, I want to know why you erased the edition that I made. I took the statistics from the RSSSF, and it's explained why I changed the statistics. Carlos Tenorio was part of the ecuadorian squad that played in the FIFA world cup 2002. If you have any doubt that he was part of LDU in 2002 please check this links: http://www.ecuafutbol.org/servicios/FichaJugadores.aspx?valor1=0502580889 http://www.fifa.com/worldfootball/statisticsandrecords/players/player=187434/index.html --Paulce1527 (talk) 02:21, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Uruguayan Primera División
Peñarol was 7 wins in a row and 9 match unbeaten see here February 13, 2011 to 23 April, 2011 (talk) 21:50, 16 June 2011 (UTC-3)

Deletion review for 2011–12 Hannover 96 Season
As a Season article task force member, you might be interested in the Deletion review for 2011–12 Hannover 96 Season redirect. The history of the debate is that the article was a duplicate article of 2011–12 Hannover 96 season. The difference being is that the s was capitalized in the duplicate article. So, I put the article up for deletion. Here is the afd page for your reference. It would be good for you to, irregardless of which side you may be on, to comment and to cast endose or overturn vote. Kingjeff (talk) 04:29, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

two pages to nominate for wiki projects ecuador
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tortuga_Bay

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Itabaca_Channel

sorry i am not that cool to have a name, i just like the edits! how about it, have a nice day! and thanks for the great assistance on the wikiprojects ecuador, ecuador is a fantastic place! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.155.7.252 (talk) 05:14, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

National football teams
Why did you undo my contributions? Banhtrung1 10:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Argenis Moreira


The article Argenis Moreira has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 17:47, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Ecuador league
Have you got a reference for the Ecuadorian Serie A being fully professional? Cloudz 679 14:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Argentine Primera División, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Club Atlético Unión (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 14 February 2013 (UTC)

Argentine leagues and teams
Hi, I've seen your sudden interest in editing Argentine leagues and teams articles. But I also noted that your edits are being more disruptive than positive, in my opinion. First of all you came to Argentine Primera División where we had a little "dispute" about the date of beginning of the tournament. I prefer not to go further on it and let it pass although I cited sources to prove my reasons. But then you went on reverting some of the changes I have made in clubs' names. Don't forget Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia rather than a football forum, so the official names of the clubs should be respected as they are. If you think different to me, I suggest you should support your arguments on their respective talk page instead of reverting all the changes I do, what has turned a bit annoying for me. I hope you try to be more collaborative. Concluding, if you have some point to clear or any other doubt, suggestion or comment, please let me know on my talk page. Thanks. Fma12 (talk) 19:26, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I don't usually make disruptive edits, although I can accept my mistakes... it's all clearer for me since I read Arsenal talk page and the manual of style about renaming. But on the other hand, you don't seem to be the most appropiated person to tell me what is "wrong", so I remember when you deleted sources in Argentine Primera División article (sources that were completely reliable, but you ignored it and arbitrarily erased them anyway with no further reasons). Fma12 (talk) 23:25, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Evidently you only know the second part of the history of Argentine football leagues. The Primera División has existed since 1891. I don't affirm it based on any invention: this is a matter of fact. There are books that told the history of Argentine football since 1867 (when the first game was held in my country), which are cited in the article. You can check them by yourself. The issue was that during many decades, most of Argentine journalists explicitly ignored the amateur era (1891-1930) because of the belief that only professional years were valid. It was until the 1990s when a group of football researchers (CHIF) told the "complete history" after years of exhaustive and serious investigations.
 * 1931 was the first year when players earned a salary for its professional services, but the Primera División as a tournament had been established 40 years before. Plain and simple, as you said. 40 years of amateur football cannot be ommitted. Therefore the addition of amateur era was mandatory to tell the complete history of the league. - Fma12 (talk) 03:25, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm convinced you are wrong, but I think it has no sense to go further with this discussion because we won't reach a consensus over this topic. Nevertheless, if you have some time, please take a look at the Primera División article on Spanish WP. About the Amateur era in Argentine football article, I know its contents because I made lot of edits there. I also think that article would be useful if it was merged into the Primera División one so much of its contents (tables, statistics, etc, from 1891-1930) are redundant. But it's just my point of view... - Fma12 (talk) 14:19, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Club Deportivo El Nacional, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Héctor Morales (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Possible nomination for Wiki Projects in Ecuador
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isla_de_la_Plata

thanks so much for the nomination of the tortuga bay page & the Itabaca Channel page for the Galapagos ,, this is another great spot on the coast of Ecuador

thanks and have a great day ! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.124.227.200 (talk) 16:37, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Photo of Silver Island - Ecuador
— Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.124.227.200 (talk) 16:40, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

LDU Squad
Only U-18 players can use numbers above 50, this year the Ecuadorian U-20 team didn't qualify to the U-20 world cup. For that reason the teams had to change the U-20 player that they used until last year for an U-18 player in their line up. For example, Walter Chávez in the match against El Nacional on February 10, 2013 wore the number 24. You can see this information here: Report of the match --Paulce1527 (talk) 13:36, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:CopaCredifeLogo.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:CopaCredifeLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 in Ecuadorian football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estadio Nacional (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

CONMEBOL competitions: points or aggregate score
Please join the discussion at Talk:2013 Copa Sudamericana. I know we had the same discussion a few years back, and it seems like, by the same editors, but maybe it is still good to state again our reasons for/against using whichever scheme. Thank you. Chanheigeorge (talk) 06:25, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Deportivo Quito
Hi Digirami, Rather than just edit warring with this IP, why don't you take your point to WT:FOOTY and gain consensus. If people agree with you then you can look to get the page protected. It doesn't seem that this constant reverting is doing anything to solve the issue. Thanks. Fenix down (talk) 07:26, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Teahouse question
Someone is having trouble with a template. You are the one who created the description of how to use the template, so you might be able to answer the question here. If it is true you don't respond to people quickly the question may get archived, but I'll try to watch for the new URL.— Vchimpanzee  ·  talk  ·  contributions  · 19:50, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito
Your recent editing history at Liga Deportiva Universitaria de Quito shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. GiantSnowman 12:34, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Please can you point me in the direction of the consensus? GiantSnowman 19:59, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Copa Libertadores records and statistics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Intercontinental Cup (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Luis Batioja


The article Luis Batioja has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:28, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of José Francisco Cevallos, Jr.


The article José Francisco Cevallos, Jr. has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:28, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of José Francisco Cevallos, Jr. for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article José Francisco Cevallos, Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/José Francisco Cevallos, Jr. until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 in Ecuadorian football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arlington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, 10.4.0.34 (talk) 09:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Talk:Uruguayan Primera División
Hi Digirami. Please see the discussion at Talk:Uruguayan Primera División. Could you please see if you could help locate an archive that you make reference to in a discussion at the WikiFootball Project? Much appreciated. Regards, Rui &#39;&#39;Gabriel&#39;&#39; Correia (talk) 21:56, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LDU Quito logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:LDU Quito logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:54, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Deportivo Quito logo.JPG
 Thanks for uploading File:Deportivo Quito logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Independiente JT logo new.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Independiente JT logo new.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 18:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Racing Club de Avellaneda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page José García. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ecuadorian Serie B, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Manta. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Intercontinental Cup (football)
Intercontinental Cup (football) - I did improve it, can you please help me to add the line-ups for each edition ! Thank you very much my friend !--Alexiulian25 (talk) 17:58, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RiverPlateEcuadorLogo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:RiverPlateEcuadorLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Invite to the African Destubathon
Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Latin American 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Latin America/The 10,000 Challenge ‎ has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Brazil, Mexico, Peru and Argentina etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Latin American content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon. If you would like to see this happening for Latin America, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Latin America, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant!♦ -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 00:32, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Fb cl MLS team
Template:Fb cl MLS team has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 13:17, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Independiente JT logo new.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Independiente JT logo new.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:River Plate Ecuador logo.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:River Plate Ecuador logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 8 August 2020 (UTC)