User talk:Digitain

Controversial topic area alert
—  Newslinger  talk   07:38, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Armenia, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. —  Newslinger  talk   07:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Hardware acceleration, you may be blocked from editing. —  Newslinger  talk   07:43, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.


 * Please do not make unconstructive edits, such as your first ten Wikipedia edits, for any reason—including the purpose of gaining an account permission (e.g. autoconfirmed). This is considered a form of gaming the system, and is not allowed on Wikipedia. —  Newslinger  talk   07:47, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Digitain. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Digitain, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.  Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 11:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of name and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions other than promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:
 * Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the Paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Salvio 11:42, 28 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Telling the world about your company's existence is promotion. Not every company that exists is entitled to have a Wikipedia article. Only companies that meet our notability criteria are eligible for inclusion, and should be written by parties with no vested interest in the business. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

Do not abuse unblock requests in this manner. Once again, see WP:COI, WP:PAID, WP:PROMO, and WP:USERNAME. Additionally, see WP:OTHERSTUFF, but fundamentally, if you have evidence those pages were written by people with a conflict of interest, please present your evidence. And frankly, if you cannot see the difference, you are too close to your subject matter to be the slightest bit objective. "world-class", "Employing more than 600 of the brightest trading minds", "productive environment at the company", "the team consists of experts from different parts of the world with clear understanding of the industry trends and innovations", this is some of the most breathlessly promotional content I've ever seen here and has no place on an encyclopedia. --Yamla (talk) 14:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. —  Newslinger  talk   09:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)