User talk:DigitalCurves

October 2013
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Hildegard of Bingen, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 03:52, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Roman Catholic (term), you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 04:22, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Despite your contention that the Roman Catholic Church never uses the adjective "Roman" to describe itself, this simply isn't true. For example, I suggest you read Dei Filius, the Dogmatic Constitution on the Catholic Faith issued by the First Vatican Council in 1870, whose first chapter begins, "Sancta Catholica Apostolica Romana Ecclesia credit et confitetur..." (see http://www.ccel.org/ccel/schaff/creeds2.v.ii.i.html ). Furthermore, the use of Roman to describe the branch of Christianity headed by the Church of Rome and its bishop (currently Francis), is commonplace today throughout academic and theological circles. It is also the standard terminology used on Wikipedia. Again, this is not the place to hash out confessional turf wars. NathanielMCampbell (talk) 14:15, 22 October 2013 (UTC)