User talk:Digitalsuresh

A tag has been placed on Krishnapriya, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Andante1980 06:55, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Padma_lakshmi.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Padma_lakshmi.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:33, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Krishnapriya
Another editor has added the "prod" template to the article Krishnapriya, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 07:32, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Mark II pump
A tag has been placed on Mark II pump requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 05:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Zero milestone marker
Thanks for uplaoding a picture of this brass marker. You have solved a mystery mentioned in the article. But exactly where on the monument is this marker located? Is it on the north face of the monument itself near the bottom? Or is it in the sidewalk near the north side of the monument? Or is it elsewhere? Furthermore, two sources state that the inscription is now illegible due to excessive wear. This is clearly not the case if you took that picture recently. Is the sidewalk around he monument concrete, marble, granite, or some other material? What are the dimensions of the marker?

You uploaded this image to English Wikipedia via Uploading images and Special:Upload. Although you gave a description in Summary, you failed to provide other required information: that this is your own work, the date the picture was taken, and named youself as author. See Template:Information. You should only use this method if the copyright status of the image is fair use. Because you apparently took this picture yourself, and you are giving permission for any use, you should have uploaded this image to Commons, not to English Wikipedia where it is not available to other Wikipedia projects. See Commons:First steps/Upload form. — Joe Kress (talk) 22:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)