User talk:Digitalworks4u

Disambiguation link notification for July 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bite (2015 Film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordan Gray. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Explanation and apology
Initially I had thought that you might have a conflict of interest (WP:COI) since at first glance the article for Bound to Vengeance looked promotional, as the initial glance at the reception section made it seem like you were selectively picking reviews to be more positive. When I began editing the article to clean it up and move it back to the mainspace (as another editor moved it) I saw that this wasn't the case, it just was that the reception section needed to be a bit better formatted. So please accept my apology for this and I hope that the prior post won't discourage you. You might want to change your username though, since that was kind of what made me concerned since the username kind of gives off the impression that you work for other people. (IE, that you are a digital media person who will work for others.)

The basic style guideline for reception sections is to split it into positive and negative so it's easier to read. I generally like to put the most common reactions first, so in this case Bound to Vengeance's coverage was negative so the negative would go first, followed by the positive or mixed reviews. When it comes to listing overall rating scores, only the critic scores on Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic need to be listed - IMDb ratings don't count since anyone can rate those and positively or negatively impact the ratings. Typically those are only mentioned if the ratings get mentioned heavily in the news ala Saving Christmas. Also, I would recommend that you not link to the actors' IMDb pages in the film article. The only IMDb link that really needs to be in the article is the film's page, which would be in the external links section. The reason for this is that this way people can see that the actors lack articles and if they pass WP:NACTOR, create articles for them. If they have articles on Wikipedia, they can be linked to.

So basically, sorry for the mixup! Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  15:54, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * However I do have to still warn you that if by chance you are related to any of the movies you've written about, you are obligated to disclose your COI on your userpage per WP:COI guidelines. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:03, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Also, if the Tomatometer on Rotten Tomatoes is 50 or under, it's considered to be "rotten" on that site so it's not really accurate to say that the movie was "fresh". This was another thing that made me think that you might be a COI editor. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  16:07, 23 July 2016 (UTC)