User talk:Digvijaykatoch

January 2017
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Kangra into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 09:55, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Katoch dynasty
Hi Digvijay, thanks for trying to improve the Katoch pages. However, please make sure that you include exactly what the sources say (but in your own words). No original research!


 * I am going to revert the information you copied from the Kangra-Lambagraon page. If you want to copy it again, using the exact content of the page, you can do so. The title of the section with "Purported" should remain. However, you now have better sources available, e.g., the Brentnall book. Why you don't write proper content using them?


 * You should also avoid using web sites as sources. They are not considered reliable sources.


 * You can use the citation tool here to generate citations for Google Books urls. It includes all the needed information.

Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 11:22, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: DigvijayKatoch (January 11)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Digvijaykatoch/sandbox/DigvijayKatoch and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister  talk  07:38, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:Digvijaykatoch/sandbox/DigvijayKatoch


Hello, Digvijaykatoch. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox/DigvijayKatoch".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 20:09, 15 September 2017 (UTC)