User talk:Digweed

Welcome
Hello, Digweed, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers: We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- PBS (talk) 12:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Creative Commons License
Copied from Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history

 I am the author of the site mentioned in this discussion. Although, I'm reluctant to allow full commercial use under the CC licence, I have no objection to text from my site being used on Wikipedia or any spin-off project because I support the principles upon which Wikipedia is based. Note that CC conditions can be waived with permission from the copyright holder. Hope that helps. digweed (talk) 13:58, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * We have to make sure that you are who you claim to be, but that would solve the problem in this case. Wandalstouring (talk) 14:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Of course. There's a contact page on the British Civil Wars site.. digweed (talk) 15:17, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

So far I have identified these articles:

As can be seen above, in late 2006 User:Blue Buccaneer seems to have been through the biography list as the British Civil War site creating many articles. However some of these entries like that for Edward Popham uses the British Civil War site as a reference but AFAICT there is no entry on the site now (see search)

There is an article called Richard Lindon and on the talk page of that article is a template called ConfirmationOTRS (see also OTRS). If User:Digweed is indeed David Plant then it would seem that he should be able to give permission for the use of some of his text via that mechanism if he so desired. --PBS (talk) 23:04, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

It would seem to me that if digweed is an Wikipedia alias name for David Plant of the British Civil Wars website, that you could initiate the necessary permission via OTRS. Please could you let me know if you are going to do this or if I should start the task of stripping out all the copied text from the above articles.

On thought on giving permission: unless you are OK with Wikipedia editors hovering up the entire content of your web site, you are going to need to make clear is that the permission is only retrospective of the date you give permission and only covers the articles above. --PBS (talk) 12:01, 2 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I received your email on 02/12/2008, thanks. At the time I was not sure what to do and decided to leave it. Recently I have been working on removing the copied text from the articles listed above. See User:PBS/BCWs copyright issues but for one article relicencing my prove to be a better alternative. Since the original copy of James Temple was taken from the British Civil War site, it has been extensively re-written by user:Rjm at sleepers and not surprisingly (s)he would like to keep the article. The copyright permission you would have to give is explained on Requesting copyright permission. Would you be happy to give permission for this specific derived work to comply with the Wikipedia licence? --PBS (talk) 18:13, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force
FYI there is now a task force for the conflicts, WikiProject Military history/Wars of the Three Kingdoms task force I'd be delighted if you would participate. -- PBS (talk) 06:29, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:17, 13 March 2011 (UTC)