User talk:Dilipawasthi

Welcome, ! Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions! You might like to check out our tutorial, a resource created especially for new users like yourself. You also may want to introduce yourself to the community at the new user log. I would suggest a look through our policies and guidelines. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or at our questions forum. I hope very much you enjoy being here with us, and I wish you luck with your contributions. - Zapptastic at

copyright problem
Please do not remove tags without discussing what you are doing. What are you doing? --JWSchmidt 14:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello, concerning your contribution,, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

Wikipedia guidelines on self-promotion and conflict of interest
Please read Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest, Wikipedia's External links guidelines, and Wikipedia's guidelines on Spam. Self-promotion is entirely unacceptable on Wikipedia. Thank you. -- Mwanner | Talk 13:46, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mwanner | Talk 14:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. Mwanner | Talk 14:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue spamming you will be blocked from editing. Mwanner | Talk 15:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link,  you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. Mwanner | Talk 15:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

The Special Correspondent
At Talk:The Special Correspondent you wrote "It is about my book and there is no question of a copyright violation". Whilst that may well be the case, you would need to read through our guidance on writing from a position which may entail a conflict of interest, and also make sure such an article is in keeping with our speedy deletion criteria, which allows deletion of pages felt to be written to "exclusively promote a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Note that simply having a company, product, group or service as its subject does not qualify an article for this criterion."

Whilst you may believe your book deserves an article on Wikipedia, you may have to accept that it would be better to have that decision made by someone disassociated with the book itself. As to the ownership of the text in question, whilst it may be your book, that doesn't denote that you own the copyright to the summarised text which you placed within the article. The website on which it was placed determined the copyright to be owned by AggarwalOverseas.com. You would have to demonstrate ownership of the text in question and then follow the guidance at Donating copyrighted materials. You may reply by either editing this page, (your talk page), or on my talk page. Hope that helps. Steve block Talk 12:38, 18 December 2006 (UTC)