User talk:Dilla2010

September 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Dilla, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 20:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Dilla, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Gyrofrog (talk) 20:01, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Again, please consider using the preview button as you make your test edits. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 20:54, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Dilla. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 16:04, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dillapress.com


A tag has been placed on Dillapress.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Dillapress.com and leave a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Peridon (talk) 18:59, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion tags
Do not remove these from articles you have created. If you wish to contest deletion, use the tag and say why you think so on the article's talk page. Peridon (talk) 19:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Dillapress. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 13:51, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Triwbe (talk) 13:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Dillapress. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. WookieInHeat (talk) 14:35, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hairhorn (talk) 15:26, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to Ceelbardaale. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gyrofrog (talk) 20:48, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dilla, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''This applies both to your repeated addition of unsourced and/or original content, as well as repeated deletion of geographical coordinates. Please use the talk page Talk:Dilla to explain what you are trying to do with this article. Thank you.'' Gyrofrog (talk) 23:10, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:22, 30 September 2010 (UTC)