User talk:Dillonsc

Speedy deletion of Jam2jam
A tag has been placed on Jam2jam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. &mdash; alex.muller (talkpage • contribs) 04:38, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Jam2jam
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Jam2jam, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.jam2jam.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:42, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Jam2jam
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Jam2jam, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Jam2jam appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Jam2jam has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyright warning
Violating copyright law is very serious and we here at Wikipedia do not allow it. the next time youi introduce copyright material you may be blocked. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 03:54, 27 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Apparently you thought I was joking, I wasn't I opened this thread regarding this issue.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 05:24, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

February 2010
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for '''The reintroduction of copyrighted material on your userepage took place after your warning. Wikipedia takes copyright seriously and cannot accept any material without explicit permission to do so. If you persist with this, your editing privileges will be removed permanently'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MLauba (talk) 12:34, 27 February 2010 (UTC)