User talk:DilqnBG

August 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Velikite Balgari. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Kinu t/c 19:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 100 Greatest Romanians, you may be blocked from editing. Kinu t/c 19:02, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:35, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Aeengath. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bulgarian occupation of Serbia (World War I) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Aeengath (talk) 23:18, 23 July 2021 (UTC)