User talk:Diltsgd

Southern Claims Commission
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Southern Claims Commission, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.slcl.org/branches/hq/sc/scc/scc-main.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 05:01, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Good work on adding sources to Old soldiers' home, but be aware that citing Wikipedia (like you did here) is not accepted practice. BusterD (talk) 21:45, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Citing Wikipedia on Wikipedia?
The notice above warns that I did a "not accepted practice." Thanks for helping me learn how to do this better. I'm just not clear whether the error was using Wikipedia as a source, or was the error the way in which I cited it? Could someone please cite me chapter and verse in the MOS or where ever it is explained what exactly I did wrong so I can learn to be more acceptable. Thanks, Diltsgd (talk) 22:21, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Take a look at WP:REF. -- The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 22:26, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Blue question mark.svg If you require any further assistance, please join the editors on IRC by clicking here. Please insure you join the "#wikipedia-en-help." This is the default channel. -- The New  Mikemoral  ♪♫ 22:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I assume you mean the CorenSearchBot warning? It says taht you copy-pasted stuff from another place, generall a copyright violation. But if you copied it from Wikipedia, that's not. But, per WP:RS, Wikipedia is not a reliable source.  fetch  comms  ☛ 22:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The best way is to use inline citations, with the tags, which is explained at WP:REF as Mike gave you.  fetch  comms  ☛ 22:30, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No I'm sure they meant the message in italics from User:BusterD above. Diltsgd, please read WP:PRIMARY as well as WP:REF. And to answer your question, yes the error was using Wikipedia as a source. -- &oelig; &trade; 22:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Family History Research Wiki


The article Family History Research Wiki has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't appear to meet the general notability guidelines. Little coverage online.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Largo Plazo (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Family History Research Wiki screenshof 2016-03-11.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Family History Research Wiki screenshof 2016-03-11.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 16 November 2019 (UTC)