User talk:Dimetrio Greene

February 2021
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jeff Bergman, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''Using fake references to support addition of information that needs references. Also block evasion of recently blocked Special:Contributions/2601:901:4301:4C50::/64'' Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:26, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Space Jam, you may be blocked from editing. Corrupted a cite with misinformation about the source Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:39, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Space Jam: A New Legacy. Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:45, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Space Jam shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Geraldo Perez (talk) 23:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Please stop vandalising wikipedia pages. Your edits on several pages do not seem constructive and have such been reverted. Please refrain from this editing practice. Cardei012597 (talk) 23:40, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:16, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:24, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Further block evasion
During the month you were blocked, you engaged in block evasion under the username 5000Dimetrio, and also through the Georgia IPs Special:Contributions/2601:901:4301:4C50:0:0:0:0/64, Special:Contributions/73.106.241.234 and Special:Contributions/73.182.34.225. You have also used the Georgia IPs Special:Contributions/174.255.209.118 and Special:Contributions/174.255.197.154. Binksternet (talk) 15:44, 2 April 2021 (UTC)