User talk:Dimitrikazeriev

The article NB Pettibone has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:39, 11 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Deleted again - please read WP:BIO and WP:V. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:43, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of NB Pettibone for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NB Pettibone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Steel Inferno until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   12:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of The Steel Inferno for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Steel Inferno is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Steel Inferno until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   12:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Reliable sourcing
I noticed that nobody has really told you why your articles keep being deleted and I thought I'd explain why, as well as go over guidelines in general.
 * 1) First off, all articles must be sourced with independent and reliable sources per WP:RS. WP:PRIMARY sources such as the authors' blog, twitter, or anything released by them or anyone representing them does not count as a reliable source. Merchant sources such as Amazon do not count either. Primary sources might show that the book exists or that the authors have written something, but merely publishing does not give notability. It's always impressive when someone can finish and publish a novel, even if it is self-published or put through a minor press, but that's not enough to establish notability via WP:NBOOK or WP:AUTHOR. We can't keep articles based on the idea that they might eventually get notice, as there is never a guarantee that that notice will come. (WP:CRYSTAL) One last thing about reliable sources: blogs are almost never usable as reliable sources to show notability. (SPS
 * 2) Secondly, the article also had issues with tone. It's written more along the lines of a fan blog and is borderline promotional in places. Sentences like "Considering that people generally read novels, they believed their messages would be in greater potency to be heard." smack of self-promotion and opinion, neither of which should be in an article. (WP:NPOV, WP:OR, WP:ADVERT, WP:COI)
 * 3) Finally, if an article is deleted for any reason, don't immediately re-add it to the mainspace. This can be seen as spam or at worst, vandalism. If you don't understand why it was deleted, it's always a good idea to ask the nominator or another Wikipedia editor. You can put "help me" into a set of –  and then ask a question. An editor will come along and help you along. If you still want to work on your articles, you can always ask that a copy be userfied into your userspace to work on. Just be aware that the article will still have to pass notability guidelines and re-adding it to the mainspace will eventually end with it being deleted again. I say eventually because not every page is caught right away. Something existing on Wikipedia does not mean that it is supposed to be there!
 * This is pretty much about it for right now, I think.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   12:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)