User talk:Dindimus

April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'groups\.yahoo\.com' (link(s): http://groups.yahoo.com/group/TheHeathenInHisBlindness/). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 14:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

S. N. Balagangadhara‎;
Hey there, brother. No need to be defensive, but the S. N. Balagangadhara‎ needs some work. Reads like a puff-piece by adoring fans. The link was to a book review: such things are not normally listed on a scholar's WP page: they're too darn trivial. An academic listed on WP has got to be known for more than book reviews. To wit: the journals S. N. Balagangadhara‎ has published in are quite weak. No offense, but S. N. Balagangadhara‎ sounds like a rather ordinary scholar, who has published some articles, book chapters, and a couple of books published with non-notable presses. That's true of 10,000 scholars who don't appear on WP.

If you feel committed to S. N. Balagangadhara‎, you might work a bit to prove his notability.

A discussion board is not an appropriate link (see policies and guidelines).

Basically,S. N. Balagangadhara‎ looks like a very ordinary scholar: he has his fans and his influences, but he's not particularly well-known, hasn't published with any major academic presses, hasn't published in any notable journals. He has virtually no presence on WP in other articles. I'm afraid his notability is rather in question. But perhaps I'm wrong: perhaps his notability can be established. Smilo Don (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2008 (UTC)