User talk:Dingdongdingdong123

Welcome!

Hello, Dingdongdingdong123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pearse dynasty, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Zakhalesh (talk) 19:30, 15 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Nomination of Pearse dynasty for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pearse dynasty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Pearse dynasty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Zakhalesh (talk) 19:42, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

April 2011
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Pearse dynasty. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Zakhalesh (talk) 19:48, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Your reference additions
Hello. You seem to be a bit confused on how references should be used. You've wrote about a connection with an organization in the article, and then precented a link to the organization's website as a reference. It doesn't work like that, as neither of the websites contained any information about the "Dynasty" and are thus not good sources for the article. See WP:CITE for further information about citing sources. Zakhalesh (talk) 20:11, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Pearse dynasty, you may be blocked from editing. Zakhalesh (talk) 20:12, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

A reply to your message
Please let me confirm that i am not confused. That reference was about a company the the family owns. Please stop deleteing whatever i edit as i add to it. Please stop your disruptive editing more like.

Thanks


 * You're using references the wrong way - the sites should have information on the dynasty, otherwise, they're worthless for sourcing. Also, if they did contain such information, they'd still be primary sources. Zakhalesh (talk) 20:18, 15 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, do not accuse me of disruptive editing. All I've done is nominate an article for deletion and remove sources that didn't help the article at all. If you wish to contest the deletion, make your case on the deletion discussion page instead of adding references that have no informational value and removing the AfD templates. Zakhalesh (talk) 20:20, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Then dont accuse me of it then. Yes all you have done is nominate an article of deletion. But you have removed sources that did help the article. I ask you to remove the notice.

Thanks


 * The sources did not help the article in any way. They could've as well been links to any random pages, as they contained no information about the dynasty they were supposed to source. Ergo, useless as sources. Also, I'm not removing any notice. Zakhalesh (talk) 20:27, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Well the sources are a disagreement between us. Lets get over that. This is a website for people who know about certain topics and by what i have heard i understand you dont know much about this British Family. But maybe im wrong. The ball is in your court maybe give me a list of what i need or if you know anything about the family please include some infomation as i am sure you will do a good job, becuase you are a top class wiki editor.

Thanks hunny x


 * Wikipedia has a strict policy of verifiability. Any content must be sourced. I don't have to know anything about any topic to see whether it's sourced or not - your article is not sourced, and as I said before, the references you had previously didn't help at all because they contained no information of value about the family or their alleged notability. I'm not terribly good at explaining and I'm going to bed anyway but if you have questions, ask WP:HELPDESK and if you wish to contest the deletion, see the deletion discussion page and comment there (I recommend you to read WP:AADD first).

Speedy deletion nomination of The Pearse family dynasty


A tag has been placed on The Pearse family dynasty, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Duplicate of Pearce Dynasty, possibly an attempt to evade AfD

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Zakhalesh (talk) 20:53, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Dingdongdingdong123 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Hyperdoctor Phrogghrus (talk) 06:36, 16 April 2011 (UTC)