User talk:Dinman01

Welcome!
Hello, Dinman01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! JoeSperrazza (talk) 15:23, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Is it possible to have this page re-activated? Dinman01 (talk) 20:00, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If you are referring to the article described below, it was deleted per a deletion discussion, which means that it should not be recreated unless you can address the concerns raised in the discussion. If you can do that, you should write a new article as a draft using the Article Wizard and submit it for a review. 331dot (talk) 20:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I am referring to the article below. I would like to re-create and will attempt to address the concerns raised in the discussion. Thank you. Dinman01 (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Kent W. Colton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kent W. Colton, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Kent W. Colton (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

I received notification of my article Kent W. Colton being declined because submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Are you able to provide a little more detail so that I can revise before editing and submitting again?

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kent W. Colton (March 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by MicrobiologyMarcus were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kent W. Colton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Kent_W._Colton Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MicrobiologyMarcus&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kent_W._Colton reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiology Marcus [petri dish·growths] 19:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I re-submitted the article Kent W. Colton on March 9th and it is currently under review status. Is it possible to have an expedited review since it is a re-submitted article?
 * Dinman01 (talk) 20:24, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * There is no way to guarantee a speedy review, be it for a new draft or a resubmitted one, they all go into the same category. Drafts are reviewed in no particular order by volunteers. Do you have a particular need for a speedy review? 331dot (talk) 20:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your prompt reply. There is no particular need for a speedy review. I will remain patient. Dinman01 (talk) 03:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hey, most people (myself included) don't do reviews or re-reviews upon request. That said, when I've reviewed pages that have addressed their issues, I'm happy to evaluate. I'll take a look at it when I'm doing AfC reviews next but I won't promise that I will approve it or decline it (sometimes if it's close and I've WP:INVOLVED having reviewed it before, I will let another reviewer make a close call determination, especially if the prior declination was based on WP:N&mdash;although a cursory glance above shows I may have had WP:IC or WP:PROMO concerns originally). If I see some areas to improve on or something that's lacking, I'll try and come back here to provide concrete feedback. microbiology Marcus [petri dish·growths] 20:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I've left some maintenance tags in the article, and I've converted your referenced authored section into a plain wikilist using the cite book, though you may want to review and see if cite journal may be more applicable. Note that in that template, you can use digital object identifiers to create links to the authored works as you would in the references section.
 * Overall however, I feel that the article is still extremely promotional in wording and my opinion is that is does not meet WP:NBIO. microbiology Marcus [petri dish·growths] 16:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kent W. Colton (June 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SL93 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kent W. Colton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Kent_W._Colton Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SL93&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Kent_W._Colton reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SL93 (talk) 18:07, 16 June 2024 (UTC)