User talk:Dino/Archive 4

Transcendental number
Hi! You reverted my recent edit at Transcendental number. My reason for the edit was this: "possibly", as an adverb, refers to "transcendental", whereas "possible", as an adjectve, refers to "numbers". (At least, this is how these word categories are used in German). Clearly, the former is more appropriate: they might be, or might not be, transcendental; but it is beyond doubt that they are numbers. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:29, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

Transcendental number
I agree with the adverb-adjective thing. But to my American ear, "possibly transcendental numbers" just sound a bit weird, whereas, "possible trascendental numbers" doesn't sound weird. Perhaps something in my roots? Was raised with English, not German.

dino (talk) 21:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)


 * If it sounds better, keep it. I'm not a native English speaker, and the issue is a minor one, anyway. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:26, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Two-dimensional graph


The article Two-dimensional graph has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "See WT:WPM"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. D.Lazard (talk) 10:57, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular
   

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Gnarled bristlecone wood.jpg


The file File:Gnarled bristlecone wood.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Akigawa River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gawa ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Akigawa_River check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Akigawa_River?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Byssus threads.gif


The file File:Byssus threads.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

An invitation to the Ninth Annual Colorado Wiknic
Who: All Wikipedia users and their families and friends are cordially invited.

What:

When: Sunday afternoon, July 14, 2019, from 12:00 noon to 4:00 pm MDT.

Where: The Wiknic will be held at our home in Arvada. Please contact Buaidh for further information or assistance.

Please add your username to our so we know how many folks to expect. You can subscribe to our to receive e-mail notice of future Wikimedia Colorado activities.

Sponsors:  and

Your hosts: Buaidh & BikeSally  We hope to see you. (You can unsubscribe from future invitations to Wikimedia Colorado events by removing your name from the ) PS: The  has been nominated for deletion. You may wish to comment at


 * Sent by ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:56, 1 July 2019 (UTC)

The future of Portal:Colorado
On June 25, 2019, Portal:Colorado was nominated for deletion. (Please see discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Colorado.) We have upgraded the portal and added several new features including selected Colorado articles, biographies, and images. If you believe the Colorado portal is valuable to Wikipedia, please help us upgrade and maintain the portal. Add your suggestions for improvement to Portal talk:Colorado. You may nominate additions at: Yours aye, Buaidh  talk contribs 17:01, 7 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Portal:Colorado/Selected article
 * Portal:Colorado/Selected biography
 * Portal:Colorado/Selected image
 * Portal:Colorado/Selected mountain
 * Portal:Colorado/Did You Know

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Colorado at 17:36, 7 July 2019 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notifications, please remove your username from the mailing list.

Your contributed article Central-peak crater merged into Complex crater
Courtesy notice... I merged your new article Central-peak crater into Complex crater since it is the most basic and common form of them. Ikluft (talk) 05:40, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Geologic faults of the Pacific Northwest.gif


The file File:Geologic faults of the Pacific Northwest.gif has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Placement of hatnotes on dab pages
Thanks for this edit but please see WP:NAMB. ―Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:18, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Removal of ref
At Tillamook Rock Light, you removed a reference because it was producing a 404 error. I restored it at tagged it with as explained in WP:KDL. Keeping the dead link is much more useful than removing it. In fact, I went and searched the website and found the article was still there at a different URL, so I repaired the Dead Link as well. This would not have been possible with just a tag. MB 01:44, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sadie Hawkins Day for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sadie Hawkins Day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sadie Hawkins Day until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Shooterwalker (talk) 01:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Elliptical dome, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ashville.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:05, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ruritania


The article Ruritania has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Element does not have significant coverage in reliable third party sources as mandated by the WP:GNG. A search shows primary sources and passing mentions, nothing to establish WP:Notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jontesta (talk) 17:00, 26 December 2020 (UTC)