User talk:DinosaursLoveExistence/Archive 1

Radio Five Live
The deletion was requested for housekeeping purposes here by User:Marknew. Ask him what the story is. Harr o 5 10:37, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

I didn't request a deletion as such: I requested that the histories of BBC Radio 5 Live and BBC Radio Five Live be merged (to fix a copy-and-paste move), following the instructions at How to fix cut and paste moves. According to that page, an administrator must temporarily delete the article, then follow the repair process. Since I am not an administrator, I couldn't do this myself! Hopefully Harro5 will now complete the process, now that I have told him. --Marknew 13:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

BBC Radio Lincolnshire
Stop posting your incorrect "facts" about BBC Radio Lincolnshire. You clearly have little knowledge of the station or its staff. --Differentgravy 18:51, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

GUS Band
The article GUS Band has been or soon will be deleted from Wikipedia. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. NawlinWiki 16:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Carre's Grammar School
I have added a "" template to the article Carre's Grammar School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Hiberniantears 16:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Education in North East England
Hi, I noticed that you added a section to the North East England article on education. I was wondering just what you meant by the NE schooling system is completely comprehensive. I can think of a number of traditionally private and selective independent schools in the region, probably as many as in other northern regions. Or am I just being thick, which isn't unusual. There is no LEA that consists of wholly seclective schools I admit. hedpeguyuk 16:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Gt Casterton
Hi, What is the basis of your comment that "The parish is shared with Tickencote and Little Casterton". Unless this has recently changed, Gt C is a separate parish (both civil and ecclesiastical). Possibly you mena the benefice is shared ... (i.e. the distinct parishes share a priest). In which case I believe Pickworth should be added.

Thanks,"Ned" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nedrutland (talk • contribs) 17:13, 2 April 2007 (UTC). Sorry - new to this! Nedrutland 17:55, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Caroline Flint
Please provide sources for the paragraph you've added to the above; given that the subject is a living person, and this material could certainly be seen as contentious, as a matter of Wikipedia policy these are required, or else the material will have to be removed. Alai 22:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Scooby Snacks
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, DinosaursLoveExistence! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \burbandictionary\.com\/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 12:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Spalding Grammar School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Alex valavanis 17:10, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of University of Bradford Union
University of Bradford Union, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that University of Bradford Union satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/University of Bradford Union and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of University of Bradford Union during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. &rArr;   SWAT Jester    Denny Crane.  05:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of De Aston School
De Aston School, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that De Aston School satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/De Aston School and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of De Aston School during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. KTC 01:34, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

September 2007
Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits. Readers looking for serious articles will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you can write (almost) whatever you want. — Zazou 22:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

Kent
As you know the Education system in Kent is a deeply politicised issue. I have read your analysis and I fail to identify the 25 schools who you refer to as comprehensive- the catholic sector did offer 'Comprehensive' education and Sheppey did and so did the Hoo peninsula. Bennet Memorial was (if I remember right) a CofE secondary modern that called itself a comprehensive for children who had failed the Kent Test. Which brings me to the point- you have not included your references- so I cannot verify. WP:5P. Further another editor spends hours of her time copy editing Kent articles adding references where they have been ommitted. This is also serious point, as your work looks like a point of view and original work and is likely to get savaged if you cannot prove otherwise. You also filled out the article on Gwyn- could you provide the references there please. ClemRutter 09:03, 18 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia's three principal content policies are Neutral point of view, Verifiability, and No original research. Since they complement each other, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another, and editors should familiarize themselves with all three. Cite references from a reliable source, especially on controversial topics

North Yorkshire
Thank you for the information on education you supplied on the North Yorkshire article, but it lacks sources. Please could you provide the sources from which the information was derived so that others can check out the details. It is one of the basic requirements of Wikipedia to provide sources for material added - see WP:Cite

Keith D 00:27, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

Paul Merrill
A tag has been placed on Paul Merrill (journalist) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Orange Mike  |  Talk  15:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Dorset education
Hi! You recently added education info into the Dorset article. I decided to put it into a sortable wikitable, and noticed that there was no reference for the info, which is necessary for such a lot of data. If possible could you add a ref or find out a weblink/publication title? All the best! Rossenglish (talk) 12:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)

Phil Woolas
Hello,

The source you've provided does not say Phil Woolas was born in Scunthorpe. Can you explain your rationale for this change or provide a different source please? -- Jza84 · (talk) 14:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the swift reply.


 * Problem sorted! This source seems to do the trick. I'll add it, if you haven't aready done so. Thanks again! -- Jza84 · (talk) 15:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Caroline Flint
I have reverted your addition to the above (my edit). I'm sure you know that Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living people states that all edits must be completely referenced to a reliable source. If you really think that Flint's sex life is good material for an encyclopedia, then re-add it (I won't edit war), but please make the source crystal-clear. Regards, Mr Stephen (talk) 16:33, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This text has been floating in and out of the article for several months, and has also been discussed at Talk:Caroline Flint. That text seems to me to be of at best marginal relevance to the career of a politician, but even if you take a different view, please do not reinstate it unless it is all referenced to reliable sources. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

West Sussex - Education -
Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. , thanks -- John (Daytona2 · talk · contribs) 20:27, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Hugo Swire
I noticed your edit here. Please do not add information that is not verifiable to Wikipedia articles. Thank you. --John (talk) 20:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Copyvio
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. --Yamla (talk) 19:05, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. --Yamla (talk) 19:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

2007 West Midlands Education data
Just wondering, where did you get the top 20 list from? It needs to be sourced in the article otherwise it isn't verifiable. Thanks, Asdfasdf1231234 ( talk ) 20:52, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Oh right, thay's cool. Did you collate all the data yourself then or is it all listed somewhere? If so can it just be put in the article somewhere? :) Thanks, Asdfasdf1231234 ( talk ) 12:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

July 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. ...... Dendodge  .. Talk Contribs 20:56, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Linking to off-Wiki images
I noticed that you are making links to off-Wiki images such as these. It's not really a good idea to make inline links like that. I looked at a couple of the images and noticed that they are licensed in way that is compatible with Wikipedia. So what I suggest is that instead of linking to them try the following. Go to Wikimedia Commons, see Wikimedia Commons, and set up an account there. Then you can download images such as this or this and using the code (and this) they provide upload the images to the Commons. Then some of the images could be used right in the Wikipedia articles rather than linking to them. You can also a template like the one seen at Yellowknife to show where the rest of the images can be seen. Just make sure that the images have a Creative Commons licence. If you need any help please let me know or ask User:Alison who is an administrator on Commons as well as here. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 20:59, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Chris Moyles
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. --Startstop123 (talk) 20:11, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Club18-30Logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Club18-30Logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:18, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Hull education
Hi, thanks for adding detail to the education section of Kingston upon Hull but have you any references for the information? Keith D (talk) 15:26, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

November 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. TubularWorld (talk) 13:44, 29 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia's policy on External linking is very clear, this is an encyclopaedia, not a repository of links. If people want this type of information, they can go to any search engine. --TubularWorld (talk) 14:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

Ditto above for Dorset youtube link. --Charles (talk) 22:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by some search engines, including Google. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Tedickey (talk) 14:25, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Universities and colleges in the East Midlands
My apologies. Of course they're not in the East Midlands. Not quite sure how they slipped in there. They actually belong in an as yet uncreated template which I'll get round to doing eventually. Thanks for tidying things up. Cheers TheRetroGuy (talk) 12:18, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:PerkinsLogo.jpg)
You've uploaded File:PerkinsLogo.jpg, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 02:54, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Howden Moor Incident
I have nominated Howden Moor Incident, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Howden Moor Incident. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of James Cooke (abductee)
I have nominated James Cooke (abductee), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/James Cooke (abductee). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ScienceApologist (talk) 15:40, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you
The article you created: James Cooke (abductee) may be deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
 * Articles for deletion/James Cooke (abductee).

The faster you respond on this page, the better chance the article you created can be saved.

Finding sources which mention the topic of your article is the very best way to avoid an article being deleted Findsources3:
 * Find sources for James Cooke (abductee): google news recent, google news old, google books, google scholar, NYT recent, NYT old, a9, msbooks, msacademic ...You can then cite these results in the Article for deletion discussion.

Also, there are several tools and helpful editors on Wikipedia who can help you:
 * 1. List the page on Article Rescue Squadron. You can get help listing your page on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
 * 2. At any time, you can ask any administrator to move your article to a special page. (Called userfication)


 * 3. You can request a mentor to help you: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond to you before responding on the article for deletion page.
 * 4. When trying to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. These acronyms don't need to intimidate you. Here is a list of acronyms you can use yourself: Deletion debate acronyms, which will help you argue that the article should be kept.

If your page is deleted, you also have many options available. Good luck! Ikip (talk) 20:41, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Howden Moor Incident on Obscuropedia
Hi, I just wanted to inform you that I've copied your article "Howden Moor Incident" to Obscuropedia, an experimental new wiki for non-notable topics. You can see it and edit it here. Let me know if you have any questions. Dcoetzee 20:43, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Club18-30brochures.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Club18-30brochures.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:27, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Inappropriate edit summaries
Hello. Please don't use inappropriate edit summaries (such as "Category" when you editing The News Quiz recently) to introduce unsourced or other possibly controversial content. Your "left-wing bias" section addition to that article has been since removed by another editor. Please use more appropriate and descriptive edit summaries in future. Thanks. [ジャム] [ t -  c  ] 09:52, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Again, I've removed your "left-wing bias" section as it is unsourced. If you want to re-introduce it, please source it.  [ジャム] [ t  -  c  ] 09:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

External link spam and warning
A number of users above have commented on inappropriate link additions. I have removed the entire set of audio links on Symphony for Organ No. 5 (Widor), as spam - we do not need 7 audio recordings -- all linked to the classicalshop.net's download site.

Please do not reinstate these. It's a very famous piece, and I am sure free or non-pay exemplars exist for encyclopedic purposes.

Also you have had a large number of warnings and comments on these themes, dating back in some cases to 2007. Although anyone may edit Wikipedia, if you wish to edit you do need to heed comments left for you. Please re-read the comments on this page, and do not repeat, otherwise you may well be blocked for improper editing in future.

FT2 (Talk 20:18, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

NPOV link additions
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies. Ranma9617 (talk) 02:02, 30 March 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Semta rgb strap.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Semta rgb strap.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for File:Semta rgb strap.jpg}
Thank you for uploading File:Semta rgb strap.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:
 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:27, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of British Expertise


The article British Expertise has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:CORP

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Falcon8765 (talk) 04:00, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Unwins Seeds
A tag has been placed on Unwins Seeds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 12:47, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Unwins Seeds
I have nominated Unwins Seeds, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Unwins Seeds. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ironholds (talk) 14:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Youtube links
Note that most Youtube links don't qualify as official links, and they should generally not be added to articles.  Them From  Space  03:18, 10 October 2009 (UTC)

October 2009
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Grim23 ★ 14:13, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Edit summaries
In a recent edit to Jordans (company) the summary read "bees". Please use edit summaries that describe to other editors what is being done. Thank you. Gri</b><b style="color:#990000">m</b><b style="color:#CC0000">2</b><b style="color:#FF0000">3</b> ★ 17:18, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

Daring
I've just reverted an edit of yours that claimed that Daring is "the first ship in the world with an all-electric ... power system i.e. it has no gearbox". I'm afraid BAE's publicity department is leading you into error! There have been ships with all-electric propulsion since at least the early part of the 20th century - for an example, see USS Langley (CV-1). Furthermore, the source given says that she is "the first front-line warship to use all-electric propulsion", which is not what the edit says, and is also demonstrably false.

I'd also suggest that the details of her propulsion system should go in Type 45 destroyer, rather than HMS Daring (D32), since they pertain to all the ships of the class. By the way, be aware of sweeping statements like "The ship also is the most fuel efficient in the Royal Navy, using around 35 cubic metres of fuel a day. As a comparison, its engines could provide enough electrical power for every house in Dundee. It could travel from Scotland to the Falklands and back without refuelling." HMS Scott, for example, uses about 20 cubic meters of fuel a day, displaces twice as much, and carries twice as much fuel, making her far more fuel-efficient and giving her a far greater range, whichever way you look at it.

I hope this help to clarify. Yours, Shem (talk) 11:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Rachel Burden
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Rachel Burden. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Rachel Burden. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Staythorpe.jpg
Thanks for uploading : I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:26, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:RocksavagePowerStationAtNight.jpg
Thanks for uploading : I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:28, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SuttonBridgePowerStation.jpg
Thanks for uploading : I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:46, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:JohnLeggott.jpg
Thanks for uploading : I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:53, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Lincoln Christ's Hospital School
DLE,

Looking at the page history, it seems that anonymous editors sometimes contribute useful information - for example,. At the same time, the vandalism is not overwhelmingly frequent. So despite the annoyance of reverting vandalism, it seems to me preferable to leave the page unprotected to all users. What do you think?

 Λυδ α cιτγ  03:03, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I understand your frustration, but it's worth reverting 10 vandalistic deletions if it means getting one useful edit. I will monitor changes to the page myself for at least a little while.  Λυδ α cιτγ  21:18, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello DinosaursLoveExistence! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are  Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:37, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Steve Holliday -
 * 2) David Drewry -

Rolls-Royce Pegasus
Hi! I noticed you added a lot of information to the Rolls-Royce Pegasus article, which is great! However, you didn't add any citations to the article. Can you please cite your additions? Also, I noticed that you reorganized the article some (new headings, etc.). When there is so little information under each heading, it is customary to leave it as longer prose paragraphs. As more information is added, you can break it into sections, but it looks a bit messy as it is now. Please stop by [|the aero-engine task force] if you interested in helping out with articles! -SidewinderX (talk) 03:02, 3 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi again! Thanks for responding to my comment. I did notice the link to the video at the bottom of the article; that's great. However, we need inline citations in the article. The video is a perfectly fine source to cite, particularly if it is online. You just need to cite it using ref tags. Check out WP:CITE for details on how to do this. It's always great to another aero-engine editor. Stop by WP:AETF and say hi on the talk page! -SidewinderX (talk) 16:31, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Election candidates
Hi, thanks for your message. I'm not planning on making articles for candidates. If any of the redlinks on election candidates get created, they will show up in the related changes (that's the reason - both MPs and candidates will be more at risk near the election). I welcome articles about candidates in safe seats - they'll almost certainly need to be created in a few months anyway - but others disagree, and the guideline supports deletion attempts in many cases. --h2g2bob (talk) 23:10, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Air Vice-Marshal Paul Clark
Could he tell me where you got this alumni information, so I can reference it. Thanks <b style="color:#000000">G</b><b style="color:#660000">ri</b><b style="color:#990000">m</b><b style="color:#CC0000">2</b><b style="color:#FF0000">3</b> ★ 18:15, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Family Focus
A tag has been placed on Family Focus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <b style="color:#000000">G</b><b style="color:#660000">ri</b><b style="color:#990000">m</b><b style="color:#CC0000">2</b><b style="color:#FF0000">3</b> ★ 18:56, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Family Focus
A tag has been placed on Family Focus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <b style="color:#000000">G</b><b style="color:#660000">ri</b><b style="color:#990000">m</b><b style="color:#CC0000">2</b><b style="color:#FF0000">3</b> ★ 13:55, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Edit Summaries
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Rtdixon86 (talk) 00:08, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

National Sheep Assoc.
Can you please reference the NSA article? Tkfy7cf (talk) 17:30, 16 May 2010 (UTC)

Canons High School
Please could stop adding external links to the body of an article. see External links Also you have been repeatedly asked to use more informative edit summaries, "Edgware" tells other editors nothing. I'll be watching this page for a reply, Cheers <b style="color:#000000">G</b><b style="color:#660000">ri</b><b style="color:#990000">m</b><b style="color:#CC0000">2</b><b style="color:#FF0000">3</b> ★ 20:05, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of National Association of Chimney Engineers
A tag has been placed on National Association of Chimney Engineers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <b style="color:#000000">G</b><b style="color:#660000">ri</b><b style="color:#990000">m</b><b style="color:#CC0000">2</b><b style="color:#FF0000">3</b> ★ 22:55, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Horticultural Trades Association
A tag has been placed on Horticultural Trades Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. <b style="color:#000000">G</b><b style="color:#660000">ri</b><b style="color:#990000">m</b><b style="color:#CC0000">2</b><b style="color:#FF0000">3</b> ★ 17:19, 5 June 2010 (UTC)