User talk:DinosaursLoveExistence/Archive 4

Speedy deletion nomination of Annita McVeigh


A tag has been placed on Annita McVeigh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Safiel (talk) 19:47, 7 May 2016 (UTC)

Concerns regarding your edits
Hi DinosaursLoveExistence, I came here to let you know that I reverted your edit to Quentin Cooper as it added unsourced personal information to this biography article. I assumed perhaps that you weren't aware of the requirement, however your page is littered with requests and warnings to include sources (seriously there are so many of them!), yet it's still happening. Also worrisome is that you used the edit summary "category change" to describe the edit, when the bulk of your edit was actually the addition of the unsourced material, which is quite misleading. So, adding my voice to the myriad others here, please ensure that you include your source when adding material (especially with BLPs) and it would be helpful if your edit summaries better reflected the edits you are making. Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:56, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --John (talk) 19:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)

Category:Banking occupations has been nominated for discussion
Category:Banking occupations, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:08, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Chandley Ovens
Hey there -- I was going through the list of articles written with a promotional tone from May 2016 when I noticed the article for Chandley Ovens. It certainly sounds like an interesting company, but I wasn't able to find much coverage of it in secondary sources. I found a few trivial mentions (see, e.g., this book), but I am concerned that the article does not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines (see WP:GNG and WP:NCORP). Do you know of other sources that we can add to the article? Thanks in advance for your help with this. Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 21:29, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Anders Kristiansen (businessman), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Weymouth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jonathan Kaye (businessman)


The article Jonathan Kaye (businessman) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * no indication of independent WP:notability. Article talks almost exclusively about the restaurant chain which already has its own article.  The parts that are not about it do not have WP:reliable sources, only directory entries at best.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 14:57, 18 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jonathan Kaye (businessman)


A tag has been placed on Jonathan Kaye (businessman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 17:03, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Ways to improve SLP Engineering
Hi, I'm Ubiquity. DinosaursLoveExistence, thanks for creating SLP Engineering!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I understand there ARE reputable sources that establish the notability of this firm, so you should add some quickly. As it is, it is in danger of being nominated for deletion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. ubiquity (talk) 15:20, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Jo Jenkins


A tag has been placed on Jo Jenkins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  DGG ( talk ) 23:40, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SLP Engineering


A tag has been placed on SLP Engineering requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 23:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Clydebridge Steelworks


A tag has been placed on Clydebridge Steelworks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 23:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Caunton Engineering


A tag has been placed on Caunton Engineering requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. noq (talk) 23:44, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harry Goodman


A tag has been placed on Harry Goodman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sir Joseph (talk) 15:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ronny Gottschlich, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camden. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 24 August 2016 (UTC)

Category:Tomorrow& has been nominated for discussion
Category:Tomorrow&, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rob Sinden (talk) 09:13, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Forest Products Research Laboratory Sadads (talk) 01:17, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of David Nieper


Hello. A tag has been placed on David Nieper requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sir Joseph (talk) 14:24, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wilfred Hardy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page West London. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jo Jenkins for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jo Jenkins is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jo Jenkins until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 20:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ABRU


A tag has been placed on ABRU requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Gbawden (talk) 11:50, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Markus Frind for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Markus Frind is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Markus Frind until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Anmccaff (talk) 16:14, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Magnadata Group


A tag has been placed on Magnadata Group, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Light2021 (talk) 18:08, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Interlanguage links
Hi, I see that you have been adding interlanguage links to several categories. However, as with articles, such links should not be added any more. Instead, such links are handled by Wikidata. Please make yourself familiar with that procedure, remove the links you have added, and create correct items in Wikidata. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 11:15, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Europe 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:46, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Jane Platt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jane Platt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jane Platt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. Guye (talk) 02:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Drilling and Sawing Association


A tag has been placed on Drilling and Sawing Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David Biddulph (talk) 04:51, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Inter-language links
I see that you added a French language link to Category:Vanguard-class submarines. You may not be aware that the way such links are usually provided these days is through Wikidata. Wikidata has some severe limitations which annoy me intensely, particularly where article scope isn't the same between languages and Wikidata allows only one-to-one mapping, but in this case Wikidata works, so I've added the French link in this Wikidata edit and removed your separate addition to the enwiki category. You can deal with the Wikidata links yourself by using the "Edit links" menu item at the bottom of the "Languages" section on the left-hand toolbar. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I see that you have made similar edits to a number of other pages, so I would suggest that you do them the Wikidata way. Among other things, this has the advantage of providing the links the other way, as (for example) fr:Catégorie:Sous-marin de la classe Swiftsure is not currently linked back to the corresponding category in English (or the other 5 languages). --David Biddulph (talk) 17:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)


 * I notice also that another editor pointed out this problem to you early last month, see section above. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. - You're still doing it, such as - Please listen to what you are told. --David Biddulph (talk) 04:55, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Zigmund Adamski for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zigmund Adamski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Zigmund Adamski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. LuckyLouie (talk) 18:27, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Peter MacNab for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peter MacNab is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Peter MacNab until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 15:56, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jill Kirby
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jill Kirby, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Gab4gab (talk) 16:15, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Paul Massara for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Massara is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paul Massara until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 15:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ABRU


The article ABRU has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Unambiguous advertising

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Montanabw (talk) 09:08, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Jeff van der Eems
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Jeff van der Eems should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Jeff van der Eems.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Okamialvis (talk) 12:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 50 Things That Made the Modern Economy


The article 50 Things That Made the Modern Economy has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Non notable radio program. No reliable sources to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  22:22, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kelly Kay


A tag has been placed on Kelly Kay requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 03:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Peter Hollins (businessman)
Hi, I'm Devopam. DinosaursLoveExistence, thanks for creating Peter Hollins (businessman)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article has potential. Please work on Wiki standards that are currently lacking.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Devopam (talk) 20:47, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Gina Boswell) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Gina Boswell, DinosaursLoveExistence!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Are you able to look this over and show how she meets WP:BIO or WP:GNG with reliable sources? Rhanks."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 21:06, 13 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chris Conway (psychic)
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Chris Conway (psychic), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Chris Conway (psychic) to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Mark  Dask  23:32, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Steve Heapy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Heapy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Steve Heapy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 13:41, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Sergio Bertolucci) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Sergio Bertolucci, DinosaursLoveExistence!

Wikipedia editor Winged Blades of Godric just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Ok!"

To reply, leave a comment on Winged Blades of Godric's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Winged Blades Godric 15:44, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Key Note
Hello DinosaursLoveExistence,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Key Note for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 JTP (talk • contribs) 16:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Colin Noble
Hi, I'm CaroleHenson. DinosaursLoveExistence, thanks for creating Colin Noble!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I have tagged the article for notability, per WP:POLITICIAN, because as it stands, there is no indication of significance beyond being a local official. See to help establish notability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

–CaroleHenson (talk) 15:03, 20 March 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about David Channing Williams
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether David Channing Williams should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/David Channing Williams.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Eddie Blick (talk) 19:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)

Michael Sharp listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Michael Sharp. Since you had some involvement with the Michael Sharp redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ansh 666 18:57, 28 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paul Burden


The article Paul Burden has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * The subject does not meet the notability criteria either via WP:JOURNALIST or WP:POLITICIAN & this reference - 'All three seats for the ward went to the Conservatives' - further highlights the article's point of view

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TopCipher (talk) 12:39, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of John Fairley
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, John Fairley, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

–CaroleHenson (talk) 14:26, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Colin Baron


The article Colin Baron has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 17:00, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clare Pizey


The article Clare Pizey has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:04, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Tomas Pietrangeli


The article Tomas Pietrangeli has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 18:05, 4 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carlos Criado-Perez


A tag has been placed on Carlos Criado-Perez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Domdeparis (talk) 15:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

removing speedy deletion tags from Carlos Criado-Perez
Hi i noticed that you have removed a speedy deletion tag from the above article that you created. You must not do this please use the talk page to contest the deletion. I notice that you have already been warned twice about this. Please don't do it again as it may lead to you being blocked. Thanks. Domdeparis (talk) 15:49, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Harold Beach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acton. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rachel Jupp
Hello DinosaursLoveExistence,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Rachel Jupp for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Atsme 📞📧 02:25, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Silentnight


A tag has been placed on Silentnight requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 09:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Gina Boswell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gina Boswell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gina Boswell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. darthbunk pakt dunf t 12:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Balgzand Gas Plant
Hi, I'm Ajpolino. DinosaursLoveExistence, thanks for creating Balgzand Gas Plant!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello! If you could add the source from which you got the info in this page, that would be a huge improvement! As it stands it's hard to verify the information presented here.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Ajpolino (talk) 21:43, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Sector Skills Council for Science, Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sector Skills Council for Science, Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sector Skills Council for Science, Engineering and Manufacturing Technologies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 02:18, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

WikiProjects
Just an FYI, but when you create a new article, try to remember to add associated WikiProjects to the talk page. This helps interested editors spot new articles and work to improve them. Associated WikiProjects can usually be found fairly easily by looking at the talk pages of closely related articles. Timothy Joseph Wood 14:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Chris Conway (psychic) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chris Conway (psychic) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chris Conway (psychic) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mcewan (talk) 20:44, 21 June 2017 (UTC)