User talk:DinosaursLoveExistence/Archive 5

Deletion discussion about 3M Health Care
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether 3M Health Care should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/3M Health Care.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Winged Blades Godric 06:14, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sandra McNally
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sandra McNally, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Rentier (talk) 16:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Weaver Viaduct) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Weaver Viaduct, DinosaursLoveExistence!

Wikipedia editor Blythwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I've linked to this article on the River Weaver map. Hope that's OK."

To reply, leave a comment on Blythwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Blythwood (talk) 13:02, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of European Federation of Sports Medicine Associations


A tag has been placed on European Federation of Sports Medicine Associations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. - MrX 14:27, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Paul Royall
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Paul Royall, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Rentier (talk) 14:56, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Halyna Kozak
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Halyna Kozak, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Rentier (talk) 01:16, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Paul Royall for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Royall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paul Royall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rentier (talk) 12:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Great Britain Diving Federation for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Great Britain Diving Federation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Great Britain Diving Federation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - MrX 13:26, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Wendy Darke) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Wendy Darke, DinosaursLoveExistence!

Wikipedia editor Innisfree987 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Hi and thank you so much for your contribution to the encyclopedia! I have reviewed it and left a few notes about where further sources are needed to verify information. I have also removed some information that is unsourced, owing to WP:BLP policies about privacy and low-profile individuals. Please feel encouraged to add that material back if it can be sourced to reliable secondary sources; I would also recommend reviewing BLP policy particularly WP:BLPPRIVACY to make sure that such restoration conform to policy. Hope that's helpful and thanks so much for your contribution! Innisfree987 (talk) 19:54, 15 July 2017 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Innisfree987's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of John Cahill (businessman)


The article John Cahill (businessman) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:BASIC notability."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - MrX 20:05, 15 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Donna Taberer) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Donna Taberer, DinosaursLoveExistence!

Wikipedia editor Innisfree987 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Hi and thanks for your contribution! Right now this entry most urgently needed in-depth secondary sources to help establish notability--ideal a profile or two to establish WP:SIGCOV lest the entry be deleted. I have added the references I've been able to find but if you have others, that would go a long way toward making sure the entry can stay. Thanks and happy editing! Innisfree987 (talk) 20:11, 15 July 2017 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Innisfree987's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Tim Hurrell for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tim Hurrell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tim Hurrell until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. pseudonym Jake Brockman talk 15:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Silentnight


The article Silentnight has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:CORP notability: sourced to corporate directories, own self, a couple of routine business transactions, and death of a connected individual."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:38, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Lynas
Hello DinosaursLoveExistence,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Michael Lynas for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Mark  Dask  22:23, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Robin Jeffrey (businessman)
Hi, I'm Arbustum. DinosaursLoveExistence, thanks for creating Robin Jeffrey (businessman)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. For example: "His favourite book is 'The Wealth of Nations'."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Arbustum (talk) 18:44, 10 September 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Robin Jeffrey (businessman)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Robin Jeffrey (businessman), DinosaursLoveExistence!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please add reliable sources that verify the personal details of this article, or they will be removed."

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

--Animalparty! (talk) 17:44, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alcohol Concern


A tag has been placed on Alcohol Concern requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 23:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Christine Tacon for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christine Tacon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Christine Tacon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 06:28, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Category:History of cardiovascular surgery has been nominated for discussion
Category:History of cardiovascular surgery, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 11:03, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mates condoms


The article Mates condoms has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sourced to company website. BEFORE does show some coverage (mainly for ad campaigns around their launch in the 80s-90s), but not nearly enough for WP:CORPDEPTH"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Icewhiz (talk) 09:41, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carello Lighting


A tag has been placed on Carello Lighting requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. &mdash;አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 02:14, 24 November 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Railway Industry Association
Hi, I'm SamHolt6. DinosaursLoveExistence, thanks for creating Railway Industry Association!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Seemingly notable, but badly needs references and footnotes

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SamHolt6 (talk) 23:43, 25 November 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Triton Showers


A tag has been placed on Triton Showers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Theroadislong (talk) 14:12, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matthew Barnes (businessman)


The article Matthew Barnes (businessman) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable individual lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. References are a listing and quotes."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. red dogsix (talk) 19:35, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Category:European Union politicians from Austria has been nominated for discussion
Category:European Union politicians from Austria, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Brown HairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:09, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, DinosaursLoveExistence!


Happy New Year! DinosaursLoveExistence, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Ceannlann gorm (talk) 23:45, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Nomination of W&G Sissons for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article W&G Sissons is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/W&G Sissons until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kleuske (talk) 13:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve David Azéma
Hi, I'm Snickers2686. DinosaursLoveExistence, thanks for creating David Azéma!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello. Thank you for your article. While this is a good start, it might be helpful to add more biographical information about David as well as expand on his involvement in Eurostar and any companies beyond that or other future endeavors. Good luck!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Snickers2686 (talk) 03:43, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Tom Service for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tom Service is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tom Service until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Za  wl  14:05, 9 January 2018 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about James Gatward
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether James Gatward should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/James Gatward.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Elmidae (talk · contribs) 08:18, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Mary Homer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Homer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Mary Homer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chetsford (talk) 00:46, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sizzling Pubs
Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Sizzling Pubs, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

John from Idegon (talk) 20:27, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Paul Price (businessman)


A tag has been placed on Paul Price (businessman) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 05:51, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Paul Price (businessman) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Price (businessman) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paul Price (businessman) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 17:02, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Category:Modes of production has been nominated for discussion
Category:Modes of production, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 22:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Peter Calder) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Peter Calder, DinosaursLoveExistence!

Wikipedia editor TheLongTone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Cor crikey this is the third new article today that has actually been of any interest!"

To reply, leave a comment on TheLongTone's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

TheLongTone (talk) 15:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Concentric (company) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Concentric (company) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Concentric (company) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#32;DocumentError (talk) 21:41, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bibiana Boerio


The article Bibiana Boerio has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG for lack of significant sourcing, fails WP:NPOLITICIAN as not holding an elected office"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 14:06, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Bibiana Boerio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bibiana Boerio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bibiana Boerio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:09, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jörg Bensinger
Hi, I'm Kudpung. DinosaursLoveExistence, thanks for creating Jörg Bensinger!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. To avoid deletion, this biography of a living  person requires substantial reliable sources. See WP:RS

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:44, 23 May 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (MEL Equipment) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating MEL Equipment, DinosaursLoveExistence!

Wikipedia editor Cwmhiraeth just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Does the company still exist?"

To reply, leave a comment on Cwmhiraeth's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:15, 22 June 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Betafence


The article Betafence has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Ordinary fencing company, no secondary references nor indication that WP:CORPDEPTH is met."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 02:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Macalloy for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Macalloy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Macalloy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KylieTastic (talk) 10:30, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Liz George for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Liz George is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Liz George& until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JMHamo (talk) 18:04, 26 June 2018 (UTC)

Graeme Macdonald (businessman) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Graeme Macdonald (businessman), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Polyamorph (talk) 10:12, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Betafence


A tag has been placed on Betafence, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Atlantic306 (talk) 15:35, 1 July 2018 (UTC)

Category:Historic silver works has been nominated for discussion
Category:Historic silver works, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Sionk (talk) 22:15, 6 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Equip Outdoor Technologies


A tag has been placed on Equip Outdoor Technologies requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Hitro talk 07:55, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

Category:Education enrollment has been nominated for discussion
Category:Education enrollment, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 19:07, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of BritainsDNA


The article BritainsDNA has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:45, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BritainsDNA


A tag has been placed on BritainsDNA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 02:29, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Holsten Pils for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holsten Pils is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holsten Pils until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ich (talk) 21:40, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Jill Kirby for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jill Kirby is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jill Kirby until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gab4gab (talk) 14:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Category:Crime templates by type has been nominated for discussion
Category:Crime templates by type, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. &thinsp;&mdash; Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs)&thinsp; 19:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)

Category:Radioactive waste repositories in France has been nominated for discussion
Category:Radioactive waste repositories in France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DannyS712 (talk) 18:32, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

PROD AccessApps
I noticed you've done some work on AccessApps. I'm just letting you know that I've proposed that this article be deleted.CircleGirl (talk) 03:14, 14 December 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Graeme Macdonald (businessman)


Hello, DinosaursLoveExistence. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Graeme Macdonald".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 13:53, 28 December 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Enertec
Hello DinosaursLoveExistence,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Enertec for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 14:43, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Selleria Equipe


The article Selleria Equipe has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:ORGCRIT notability guidelines."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jmertel23 (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)