User talk:Diogenesdacynic

October 2012
Hello, I'm 69.62.243.48. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Zink magazine, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 69.62.243.48 (talk) 23:53, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Zink magazine shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Meters (talk) 23:57, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

ANI
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:58, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit-warring and WP:BLP violations, as you did at Zink magazine. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:07, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

THIS IS NOT A LIVING PERSON -- ALL INFORMATION POSTED CONTAINED REFERENCES TO CREDIBLE, AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES -- PLEASE RESTORE IT AT ONCE

FACTUAL INFORMATION WITH REFERENCES WAS DELETED -- PLEASE RESORE IT IMMEDIATELY


 * An article does not have to be a biography for BLP to apply. Anything that affects living people comes under BLP. Meters (talk) 02:57, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Your response to the block is a stereotypical example of an unblock request that would almost certainly be denied. See Guide to appealing blocks. A week is not a long time to take a break and do something else for a bit. -- Ritchie333 (talk)  (cont)   09:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)