User talk:Diotime

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Khoikhoi 09:19, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Old contrib in Demographics of BiH article
iHola Diotime! Well, that sentence was a tipfeler (an error). What was ment, that in the period of 1945-91 (when Bosnia and Herzegovina was part of Socialistic Federal Republic of Yugoslavia) percentage of Croats fell by a quarter of its previous number (it was 23,9% in 1948 and it fall to the 17,4% in the 1991). I refrased the sentence, but any improvment is welcomed:) Cheers amigo :) --Čeha (razgovor) 19:20, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * You guys are such jokers... or do not know english well enough to describe that what you are talking about is the share of croats to the total population. As we can see, the official census numbers show an increase of croats, almost every decade. Have fun pondering what you guys did wrong, with this data...

(LAz17 (talk) 19:37, 13 June 2009 (UTC)).
 * 614,123 in 1948
 * 654,229 in 1953
 * 711,666 in 1961
 * 772,491 in 1971
 * 758,140 in 1981
 * 760,852 in 1991
 * Let me repeat once again. Number of Croats fell in the relative ratio. From 23,9% to 17,4% due to higher imigration (perhaps even better natural rate in BiH muslims) than other nations. Relative ratio of BiH Serbs (percentiges) also fell. Their's absolute number hower increased. I don't know, Laz, but I think that my English prety well explains fall of the percentage by a quoter, wouldn't you think so?

Or I need to translate everything in Croatian, for you to comprehend ? :)--Čeha (razgovor) 19:45, 13 June 2009 (UTC)


 * I was messing around, you guys said that the total number of croats fell... when in fact it is as you say not, the portion of them fell. I posted census data just now... their number increased a lot, in terms of the number of people, but in terms of portion, it is down. (LAz17 (talk) 02:21, 14 June 2009 (UTC)).


 * Not total number, percentage. You can see it in an original qoute: During the time of percentage of Croats fell Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia Croatian_percentage_in_Bosnian_municipalities_1971-1991 by more then a quater. here is the tipfeler, it should have been:

During the time of Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia percentage of Croats fell in BiH municipalities by more then a quater. As I said it is mostly due the high emigration of rates of BiH Croats (similar situation was with BiH Serbs, although their emigration rates were lower than Croatian ones). It is possible that BiH Bosniaks/Muslims also had much higher natural growth (higher natalitet), but I don't have exact numbers for that. Bosniak emigration rate was almost equal to zero, while Croatians (and Serbs) did emigrate in large numbers to SR republics of Croatia (or Serbia) and western europe... That is the main point of that fell in percentage. Serbs percentage fell from 44.3 to 31.4 which is about the same amount. 17.4 is 72.8% of 23.9 and 31.4 is 70.9% of 44.3. However most of the BiH Serbs settled in Vojvodina raising percentage of Serbs in it from 1/3 in 1918 to 2/3 in 2001. Bosniak percetnage on the other side grew by 42.3% from 30.7 in 1948 to 43.7 in 19991. --Čeha (razgovor) 21:14, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited History of Nairobi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pastoralist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drylands, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Precipitation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:07, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nakuru County Peace Accord, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maasai. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

The (un)Australian moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, The (un)Australian, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 14:08, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The (un)Australian (June 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The (un)Australian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_(un)Australian Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pbritti&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_(un)Australian reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 17:02, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The (un)Australian
Hello, Diotime. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The (un)Australian, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The (un)Australian (November 17)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The (un)Australian and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_(un)Australian Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:WikiOriginal-9&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_(un)Australian reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~WikiOriginal-9~ ( talk ) 14:43, 17 November 2023 (UTC)