User talk:Dipanb

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome! Immunize (talk) 18:05, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Paramahansa Srimat Swami Nigamananda Saraswati Dev
A tag has been placed on Paramahansa Srimat Swami Nigamananda Saraswati Dev, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Immunize (talk) 18:05, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

The article was deleted...
...Because it merely contained a link; that is not allowed here, per WP:NOTLINK. Please be aware that if you keep creating inappropriate articles you might end up blocked. Salvio ( Let's talk 'bout it!) 18:24, 9 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment The Deletion Review process would be the best route for further discussion. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 19:02, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

More advice
Wikipedia is not a notice-board on which to post anything you like: it is an encyclopedia with its own rules about what articles are acceptable. Two of Wikipedia's important policies are:
 * Verifiability, which includes: "The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth&mdash;whether readers can check that material added to Wikipedia has already been published by a reliable source, not whether editors think it is true."
 * Notability, a requirement to have a Wikipedia article, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and press releases.

The article was deleted as a result of a deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/Paramahansa Srimat Swami Nigamananda Saraswati Dev, because it did not cite any independent reliable sources to establish notability.

User has already requested its restoration three times here, here and here, and it has been explained to him that, as the deleting administrator has declined his request, his only way forward is to ask at WP:Deletion review, but he will have a better chance of success by first preparing a new draft article in his user space, showing references from independent, reliable sources to confirm what the article says.

To understand better the requirements for a Wikipedia article, read WP:Your first article. Note also that Wikipedia is not for promotion or advocacy of any kind; articles require a neutral point of view; and that material must not be copied into Wikipedia from other websites unless a proper copyright release has been arranged as explained at WP:Copyrights.

JohnCD (talk) 19:41, 9 May 2010 (UTC)