User talk:Dippraksh rajput

February 2019
Hello. Your recent edit to List of shipbuilders and shipyards appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 14:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Vaishali (ancient city), you may be blocked from editing. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Then provide me proof of vaishali is not related to vais. Dippraksh rajput (talk) 14:33, 7 February 2021 (UTC)


 * That's not how WIkipedia works, You have to provide the source in support of your content not me as per WP:BURDEN. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:56, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Before i edit the page fact attach to it is propoganda set by some specific group of people. I am from vaishali a vaish kshatriya. And some one edit page according to himself is right. If wp is concern about then verifi fact by physical examination not by source. Dippraksh rajput (talk) 09:20, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * I don't know what you are trying to say. One of the core Wikipedia policies is to provide reliable source in support of your change as you are suppose to bear the WP:BURDEN of the change not other users. We do not change content based on personal choices and whims. That content is supported by the government source. You would need a WP:HISTRS complaint source to counter it. And if you get one, please open a discussion in the Talk:Vaishali (ancient city) first. Thank you. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Government it self propoganda making tool. government has not knowledge about fact like these. I know how government website works. Dippraksh rajput (talk) 13:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

I go through bihar tourism website there is not any proof about king vishal established vaishali it is propoganda. Nothing else. Dippraksh rajput (talk) 13:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)


 * It is written here. We cannot modify content based on your conspiracy theories. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 14:52, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Source of government website is not veryfaiable Dippraksh rajput (talk) 15:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


 * It is reliable. Could you provide a better source? Bring it to talk page of the article. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Means if some one edit something provide wrong information it is right thing according to wp therms. Only reference is enough not rightness Ness is not matter. If things worked like these then wp not reliable source of information. Dippraksh rajput (talk) 11:22, 10 February 2021 (UTC)


 * How would we know that the information provided by you, me or any other user is right, if no reliable source is provided with the content? For Wikipedia, we have to use reliable sources in support of our content. It is simple. Also see Wikipedia is not a reliable source. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)