User talk:Diretor Adobe

Third-party imagery on Coverage of Google Street View
Hi Diretor Adobe,

I've removed your last edit to the Coverage of Google Street View article because it lists third-party imagery rather than Google-collected imagery. I've explained my rationale on the talk page: Talk:Coverage of Google Street View.

TheAckademie (talk) 14:59, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi again, I just wanted to follow up on the third-party content question. The reason I think it's third-party content is because if you look at the upper-left corner of the Morocco link, for instance, it says "ZEDIX360." If you look up that name on Google, you'll see that's it's a private company that is uploading the content. Notice on this page that Google does in fact accept third-party content, and what you've listed is an example of it. In the talk page for the article, I've listed the sources of the locations you've posted, none of which are produced by Google: Panama is Luis Alvarado, Cyprus is Makro 360, etc. If you're certain they're Google-produced, I would be happy to accept that, but first I'd need to see some clarification. Let me know if you have any questions! :) TheAckademie (talk) 00:33, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

IP block exempt request
I would like to make edits when my IP address is automatically blocked. Diretor Adobe (talk) 20:29, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Google Street View image
The image that you have changed has many problems. Please update the map, first. For example Pakistan, India and Turkey have partial coverage and must colored with lightblue. - Eugεn  S¡m¡on  (14) ®  12:00, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Please make a request for D97v in commons, add a new topic in User talk:D97v to make a update request. Diretor Adobe (talk) 12:03, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * You can do it by yourself. So please wait until the image will be updated, then add the new one on the article. - Eugεn  S¡m¡on  (14) ®  12:05, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Google Street View image
It appears you have added material and then instantly removed it, many times in a row, What is the rationale here? Perhaps I am missing something? Cheers, Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi  17:18, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I note that you never bothered to respond to me. I also note that you have done it again and again. Can you explain these edits should not be viewed as disruptive? And also, ignoring other editors might incline them to doubt the necessity of your presence here. Cheers, Muffled Pocketed  14:37, 29 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Three months later, it seems that now you never will reply to me... Muffled Pocketed  10:36, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Warning
Don't delete discussion tags from wikipedia articles. This is disruption of wikipedia and you you may be blocked for this. Staszek Lem (talk) 21:04, 25 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Please don't move content around while the deletion discussion is in process. This could be considered WP:GAMING. Let the discussion run its course and a decision will be made whether to keep, merge, or delete the article. clpo13(talk) 21:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Google Street View
Please give me a link with Timbuktu and others areas, that you've added. - Eugεn  S¡m¡on  14:33, 16 August 2016 (UTC)

Coverage of Google Street View
Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Coverage of Google Street View, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed, even you may be blocked for editing. Sockpuppetry is also a problem if you are User:Compain Here. Eugεn S¡m¡on  14:08, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Google Street View
Hi Diretor Adobe, I've noticed that you have listed Tunisia as being on Google Street View a number of times. Unfortunately that's not the case, so it would be preferable to refrain from posting that until Google actually releases Street View imagery (which is different from user-contributed Photo Spheres) in Tunisia. I've provided more detail in Talk:Coverage_of_Google_Street_View. TheAckademie (talk) 17:31, 13 October 2016 (UTC)
 * @ User:TheAckademie no need to explain what Street view is. His edits are obvious near to vandalism and also unconstructive. Hope he will be blocked if continue doing this. - Eugεn  S¡m¡on  20:18, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Coverage_of_Google_Street_View shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.Billhpike (talk) 13:03, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You are suspected of sock puppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/Sjnester. Thank you. --Triggerhippie4 (talk) 08:23, 24 October 2016 (UTC)