User talk:Dirrigible

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Be neutral and don't add information that is so biased.

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

It is interesting to observe that wikipedia is not the fair open editing operation it claims to be - on many controversial pages, an edit against the "ownership" group's viewpoint will get you "disappeared" if the owner of that page is also a monitor. I have attempted to make the article Islam and other Religions more reflective of reality and give it a npov - instead a pro taliban clique of self identified muslims (who I would describe as radical islamists) have taken over the page, and led by an editor described as "annonymous" have banned me day after day, long after I gave up my attempt to provide balance and objectivity to the site. So wikipedia's claim to be an "open edit" operation is untrue - and I would advise all potential editors to stay away from controversial sites, you won't be dealt with fairly and you will be prevented from editing by a "superior" class of editors who have "blocking" privileges and who will use them to disappear you. Sorry for this dash of reality.

Wow, the administrator "anonymous" strikes again with Taliban precision, for the umpteenth consecutive day he has disapperared me, violating Wikipedia's policies for administrators. How long will this administrator be allowed to violate Wikipedia laws? How long before Wikipedia show this administrator the door?

So our "annonymous" canadian convert to islam continues to disappear your editor from editing wiki. violating all the rules of wiki, and despite being promised by wiki that they would insist "anonymous" stop his day by day vicious vindictive actions, "anonymous" in the tradition of raidcal anti western muslims continues to violate his duties as a moderator by violating the free speach right of others. There is a concept in Islam that all non Muslims are "dhimminis", e.g. second class citizens who will be tolerated only if they accept their second class citizenship and lowler status than that of muslims. To some extent that second rate status has been imposed on the West already (cf. the harrassment Denmark has faced for allowing freedom of speach, etc.) Clearly the "annonymous" personality type revels in the power given him by his new group affiliation, without having to prove his worth in either the business or academic world, he now revels in his superior position by joing a religion that believe all non members are second class to him. "Annonymous" represents a totalitarian personality type, he is only a couple of steps removed from those who would participate in acts of terrorism. It's sad that wiki is unable or unwilling to deal with this cancer in its midst.