User talk:Dirtbag Venture

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Hooten Hallers (May 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Hooten Hallers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 15 May 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:The Hooten Hallers


Hello, Dirtbag Venture. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Hooten Hallers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  T K K ! bark with me! 01:45, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

October 2020
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Clownvis Presley. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 14:00, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Drmies This is in reference to your editing comments. Can you please explain why it is unacceptable to have a videography section on this page but acceptable for other artists? The OK Go videography page has youtube links to each music video mentioned as references. Would it be acceptable if I created a separate page as with OK Go? I appreciate your point of view about some other aspects of the article: I had emailed the artist to verify that the information was correct, but I understand that more published sources are needed.Dirtbag Venture (talk) 15:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The article needs secondary sources: primary sources don't help, and primary links are frequently seen as, well, promotional. That other articles have it doesn't make it OK and I'm about to go look at it. But if you are in touch with the artist (I'm sure you're not getting paid for it, but that's immaterial), you should probably declare your conflict of interest--see WP:COIDEC. Take care, Drmies (talk) 20:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)