User talk:Dirtlawyer1/Archives/2013/January

The WikiProject: Good Articles Newsletter (January 2013)
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:45, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Pro Bowl selections
Where is the consensus we do not use "selection" in the infobox?► Chris Nelson Holla! 22:55, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Greetings, Chris. In answer to your question, the consensus was determined by an actual RfC on the WP:NFL talk page.  Please see the sectioned entitled "Request for Comments" in Archive 9 of the WP:NFL talk page.  In addition to addressing the use of the word "selection" in formatting infobox honors, there are also extended discussions regarding the use of the redundant "1x" and other unnecessary words like "champion" and "winner."  Please note that this does not preclude the use of the word "selection" and the like in main body text, but only in the context of the space-limited infoboxes.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Where is the consensus? I think selection helps differentiate between selections and alternates more clearly...► Chris Nelson Holla!


 * Chris, please note that the !vote was 7 to 1 on the specific question of whether we should omit the word "selection." Seven to one is a pretty darn strong consensus, especially in the context of an actual RfC that was properly noticed on the NFL and CFB talk pages and was open for comment for almost two weeks.  The only editor opposed (i.e. supporting the continued use of the word "selection") was the IP user who had inserted most instances of "selection" in the first place.  That having been said, there is no reason why you should not use the word "alternate" to differentiate Pro Bowl alternates from actual selections.  I continue to use the word "alternate" in the NFL player infoboxes when it applies for the exact reason you suggest.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:39, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Okay. I guess I just feel that "Pro Bowl" and "Pro Bowl alternate" get more muddled rather than having "Pro Bowl selection" vs "Pro Bowl alternate." But consensus is consensus.► Chris Nelson Holla! 23:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * BTW, I'm glad to see that you are actively editing again, and it looks like most of the past controversy has slipped into history. Several of the strongest football editors have faded away recently, and we have a lot of newbies and IP users who don't see the Big Picture in terms of WP policy and guidelines or consistent formatting.  There's a lot of room for an experienced editor like yourself to do a lot of good, constructive editing on football articles.  Please let me know if there is anything I can do to help, if there is a discussion in which you feel I should be involved, or if you just want a sounding board for an idea or two.  Regards, Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 00:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Sounds good.► Chris Nelson Holla! 00:13, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Leslie Rich (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Leo Goodwin


 * Mike Zunino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Kevin O'Sullivan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Dinosaur trace fossil list
Why did you remove those flags? They looked nice there. Abyssal (talk) 15:16, 7 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Greetings, Abyssa, and thank you for inquiring regarding the flag icons. Per MOS:FLAG, flag icons are not supposed to be used as mere decoration generally, nor to symbolize a city, state, province or country cited in article text, list or infobox.  In the dinosaur fossils list, simply adding the flags of the states, provinces and countries where the fossil ranges are located is not permitted.  Please read MOS:FLAG, and I will be happy to answer any questions that you may have regarding the flag icon policy to the best of my ability.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:03, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

NFL player infobox, residence parameter
I already mention this on the article's talk page, some ten months ago. Nobody reacted. How long am I supposed to wait for "consensus"? I simply acted per WP:BRD. --bender235 (talk) 12:37, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Bender235, a residence field seems unnecessary to me. Where a player resides in retirement does not strike me as a particularly core piece of data.  It can be noted sufficiently in the body of the article. Jweiss11 (talk) 12:49, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Bender, it would be appropriate to raise the issue on both the template talk page and the WP:NFL talk page. Template:Infobox NFL player is already a very large template when all options are used, and can become ridiculously large when the subject player has numerous career honors.  A "current residence" parameter is also problematic because good sources don't exist for a majority of players, and it requires constant update.  It's also not terribly relevant.  Most current players live in the metropolitan where the team is located, but many also split time elsewhere including their home towns.  NFL.com is a reliable source for birth places and high schools (a good proxy for home towns).  Tracking the current residence of retired players is difficult, again, because few reliable sources exist that are regularly updated for players after they retire.  If there is some reason for including a player's current residence, and a reliable source exists, then it may always be included in the body text.  Not every factoid about a player needs to be included in the article infobox.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 13:00, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

dashes
Thanks for letting me know, Dirtlawer1. I won't change anymore of them. To me, they are both great to serve for in between scores of games and teams' records as I've noticed authors use them both for this reason. I kept some of my en dashes between scores, etc. Just a preference (en dashes are great in between years), but I respect other authors' work totally. I was just changing en dashes where I had made the edit for the en dash before (from Sept - late December). I won't edit anymore of them, I promise. It was just a small preference within some of my own articles that I have worked on. I won't edit anymore. Thanks. Rod Hayes (talk) 03:26, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Flags on WBC rosters
Why did you remove the flags on the 2013 World Baseball Classic rosters for the baseball teams that they play on? You said it was "inappropriate" but see 2009 World Baseball Classic rosters, 2010 FIFA World Cup squads, and Basketball at the 2012 Summer Olympics – Men's team rosters just to name a few examples where the flags were used. Perhaps I am misunderstanding, but what makes this different? Please let me know. Thanks. Smartyllama (talk) 18:27, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Greetings, Smartyllama. I just checked the links you provided.  The use of flag icons for individual players on team rosters (or their home club) is not appropriate there, either, and it appears to be a function of the common roster template coding used in each case.  To be clear, there is simply no justifiable reason to use flag icons to designate the home country of professional sports teams that do not represent the home country in international competition, and none of the professional baseball teams listed actually compete in international sports events.  For this same reason, we do not use flag icons in articles about MLB, NBA, NFL or college sports teams or their respective athletes.


 * Please don't misunderstand me; I'm actually a strong advocate of the appropriate and properly limited use of flag icons in sports articles. Their use is supposed to be limited to designating national teams and athletes that compete in international sport events.  Please note, however, there is actually strong support for banning flag icons altogether because of the overuse and inappropriate use of flag icons.


 * If you're interested in preserving the appropriate use of flag icons in sports articles, please feel free to express your opinion regarding the use of flag icons in sports articles in this ongoing Request for Comments. Otherwise, their use may be banned altogether if editors who believe in their appropriate use don't speak up.  The same folks who overuse and abuse flag icons also tend to avoid serious discussions about their use.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

You've got mail!
Automatic Strikeout ( T  •  C ) 21:37, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

User:CompDude13
quack quack. Jrcla2 (talk) 05:48, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Special:Contributions/2607:FE50:0:820B:8CEF:FCC:C863:D14? Edit summaries are uncharacteristic but the address geolocates to south Florida - JohnInDC (talk) 11:56, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 00:38, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Yes
Yes, I would be happy to. You would be a great admin. Have not done it before so it would help to have an experienced co-nominator. Cbl62 (talk) 22:50, 18 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thank you, sir. Secret previously offered to nominate, and I'm following up with him.  I may also ask Ironholds to co-nom, too  God knows he had enough experience!  Nothing like a good roast for entertainment.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 00:00, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * How soon do you expect it to be (i.e. How soon do you want me to have a statement prepared)? Automatic Strikeout  ( T  •  C ) 04:02, 19 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks, ASO. Either next Friday or the following Friday, I think.  I'm trying to clear the deck to be able to respond to questions as they arise.  Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 12:15, 19 January 2013 (UTC)
 * If ASO is taking the laboring oar and preparing a statement, Friday evening is fine. I've got an all-day mediation on Friday, but can make time that evening or Saturday to add my statement of support.  Cbl62 (talk) 23:37, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

DragoLink08
I've asked about a specific range of IP addresses to block, but since I need to get going, I might not be able to see a response quickly. I'll be popping in and out, however, so if you leave a note at my talk, I'll be able to respond to it quickly. Be aware that your message has a slight chance of getting lost in a flood of messages; the link in my last ANI message is probably going to spark a bunch of messages like this, judging by past precedent for people in similar situations. Nyttend (talk) 18:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Nyttend, can we block the specifically identified IP addresses (list at ANI) while others determine the best way to implement a range block? Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 18:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 * After waiting for a response for a good while, I gained a distinct impression of how to levy the rangeblock (I've never performed one before), so the University of South Florida is now unable to edit for three months. Nyttend (talk) 03:20, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No remorse: it's been a very naughty university. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 03:22, 26 January 2013 (UTC)