User talk:Dirtlawyer1/sandbox2

Responses
I'll go point by point here

1. I don't know about this one. I've always been a fan of the stats being there. I think there just needs to be an agreement to limit what stats are there. For example in baseball, we've kept the stats to just triple crown ones (batting average, home runs, ERA, etc) unless the player is well-known for non-triple crown stats (Ricky Henderson stolen bases, players with 3000 hits, Rivera's saves, etc). For example, for QB's i'd limit it to touchdowns, interceptions (Touchdowns–Interceptions format preferably), passing yards and maybe QB rating, with Michael Vick being an exception since he is also well known for his running ability, so i'd include rushing yards for him.

2. Support. Doesn't seem necessary. A lot of the time this isn't even filled out.

3. Support. Good enough in the early years/high school section

4. I'm not sure about this one either. I always seem to be using these. I personally think we should just limit to NFL.com. The Database Football ones sure have to go though, that website hasn't been updated in years and doesn't provide anything that NFL.com and PFR don't.

5. Strong support. Just not notable enough to be clogging up the infobox.

6. Strong support. Don't need minor awards like the "Tim Tebow's freak of the year" or something along those line's that somebody added recently.

7. Support. Agreed with only the top championships.

8. Support. Some of them have just way to much highlights (Antonio Brown, Le'Veon Bell)

9. (Just need clarification on this one. Do you believe that the team's the player didn't play for shouldn't be in the infobox?)

10. Support. Honestly probably should have been already.

--Yankees10 18:26, 9 January 2015 (UTC)