User talk:DirtySocks357(WreckItRalph)

Landlocked
I noticed your discussion about adding "landlocked" to various US state articles, and wanted to ask: are you intending to add landlocked/coastal to every state article? If so, I would strongly suggest opening a discussion somewhere like Wikipedia talk:WikiProject United States (or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geography) and gauge other editors opinions before making changes to so many articles. Also a minor note, I think it's a bit misleading to say in your edit summaries that you had reached consensus with Pbritti about this change, as that is not what happened. They did not agree that this term should be included, but suggested you restore it so that other editors would give more opinions. Good luck on your campaign.&#32;-- Fyrael (talk) 19:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

 * Kindly confine your editing in the AI area, per the notices above and WP:ARBECR, to the filing of edit requests only. Thank you. Selfstudier (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I apologize for the oversight, thank you for correcting me! DS537(WIR) 18:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

The MLB nomination
Thanks for going ahead and putting up the nomination. After the recent NFL and NBA discussions it was just a matter of time until someone would test the MLB pages to see if a similar result occurred. Now we at least know, which is a benefit for Wikipedia. And, again, welcome, I hope you enjoy editing the project. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)

Reverted article merger
I have reverted your merger of the articles skateboarding and skateboarding trick as the merger proposal you started has not yet reached a consensus. If you wish for additional input, you can ask here. -- JascaDucato (talk &#124; contributions) 22:39, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Well, I won’t undo your revert, but I’d like to understand why the merge fell solely upon the proposal. Per WP:WTRMT, You may remove a template when according to your best judgment the lack of edits and/or talk page discussion should be interpreted as the issue not worth fixing (as a form of "silent consensus"). The merge lasted a solid amount of time prior to the revert, and could have been beneficial to readers. Hope we can agree on something. DS537(WIR) 12:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)

Unblock clarification
@Yamla, thank you for reviewing many of my edit requests. I understand that the block was necessary to prevent disruption of the encyclopedia. However, I am now completely aware of all rules I must follow and take complete responsibility for what I did disruptively. As mentioned in the unblock decline, WP:SO is probably your only option at this point. May I ask why? Per WP:GAB, I have already extensively covered that the block is no longer necessary because 1. I understand what I have been blocked for, 2. Will not cause damage or disruption, and 3. That I will make useful contributions instead. Any questions or concerns will be responded to as quickly as possible. I hope you may understand where I am coming from, and kindly advise that you thoroughly review my comments rather than declining requests and removing tpa, thank you. DS537(WIR) 02:24, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Your abuse of this account to evade your block (violating WP:BLOCK, WP:SOCK, and WP:EVADE) shows pretty conclusively you haven't the slightest intention of abiding by Wikipedia's policies. Until we are sure you are willing to abide by our policies, you aren't going to be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 11:38, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, I think I understand now. So if I do not make any more accounts, and leave my IP undisturbed, I can be sure that I may be unblocked per the standard offer? I would like to request that the SO time be shorter, as I no longer edit disruptively, and I will not create any more accounts. I think I have shown full understanding of disruptive editing and have cleared up that I will not make them (this includes talk page rules, edit wars, contentious topics, etc.) and will make useful contributions instead. Please and thank you. DS537(WIR) 12:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * No. You absolutely cannot be sure. Please reread WP:SO. Your claim that you have "shown full understanding of disruptive editing" is absolutely bizarre. You've shown no meaningful understanding so far. I won't respond further. --Yamla (talk) 12:41, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

My next move (considered carefully)
Hello again. After some discussion, I've noticed many editors suggesting that I take the standard offer. It seems there is little possibility of me being unblocked early. I have decided that the best course of action is to wait it out; six months from now will be November 8, 2024. Thank you all, peace. DS537(WIR) 21:54, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Sincere unblock request
DS537(WIR) 20:44, 20 May 2024 (UTC)